Dr. Francis Boyle Outlines Legal Strategy for Local, State, Military Regarding Covid, Frankenshot

Dr. Francis Boyle discusses legal ways to resist. This is important to listen to if you are interested in resisting.

Original Post

You can listen to the original broadcast.  At a certain point Dr. Francis Boyle says to take out paper and pencil to jot down the information he is giving.

This is a partial transcription of that information, along with the approximate minutes:seconds of the video where it occurs.

The transcription is not complete.  It is not perfect.

Other than Fauci’s, [name] or [names]  replaces names heard.  If someone needs the information, they can listen themselves and discern the names.

This calls for legal action at the local and state level from those who have lost loved ones due to Covid or the Frankenshot.  There is also separate advice for the military.  There is also a book recommendation for lawyers.

Pass this on to people who need the information or it’s here for you to use yourself.

Partial transcripton below.  Not perfect.  Not complete.  Not grammatically correct.

Dr. Francis Boyle Interview with Alex Jones.  Larger blocks of information are Dr. Francis Boyle speaking.

35:51 Alex, right now I want to sketch out a strategy for resistance that all of your viewers can undertake if they want to, resistance to this medical tyranny. And I hope people could pull out a pencil and paper at this time. And I don’t mean to sound too much like a law professor here. I’ll try to speak in plain English and I will try to present this in plain English. If it departs from that, please interrupt me and ask me to explain. But what we’re seeing now is that the Biden administration is working in cahoots with Fauci and all the rest of them, imposing these Frankenshots on the American people and you can just see the deaths and disabilities rising up. So I want to point out that there is a way we can fight back. And the way we can fight back is the beauty of the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, that says, “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited to it by the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.” So I don’t think we are going to get anywhere or much help from the federal government because the federal government is after us on the Frankenshots. What I’m suggesting here, then, is that we exercise our rights under the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and try to get Fauci [names] and everyone else involved in this indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder at the state and local levels of the United States government. Likewise, I will go through a strategy here that the exact same thing be done over the Frankenshots. So let me explain the first strategy to try to get Fauci [names] indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder over the Covid-19 pandemic. Now I was originally hired here to teach criminal law and I taught it for seven or eight years before I moved over to teach international human rights law, but I still do criminal cases, both prosecution and defense on matters of principle. Murder is defined at common law, and here I can’t speak for all 50 states of the Union, but we are a national law school here and we train lawyers to practice law all over the country, so what I am doing here is explaining to you general principles of criminal law that apply in all 50 states of the Union. And here again, we have to focus on the state and local level because the federal government’s Department of Justice is now working in cahoots with Biden and Fauci and [name] and the rest of these people. So at common law, the common law of most states of the Union, murder is defined as “the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought”. Okay, so let’s go through those elements on the pandemic first. On the “unlawful killing of the human being” we have a violation of my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. That is a federal crime, punishable by life imprisonment. Okay, so we have that element established. Killing of the human being. Yes, large numbers of people here in America have been killed by the corona virus pandemic. The probable estimate is well over now a million people, a million Americans in excess deaths. All right, then we come “malice of forethought”. “Malice of forethought” is a legal term… and I’m not going to spend a lot of time here lecturing you and your audience on all the elements of “malice of forethought” That would take me four or five days.

[Alex speaks]

41:30 I’m going to get into that. Let me explain here. There are differents types but in this case, with respect to the pandemic, one element of “malice of forethought” is manifesting grave indifference to human life, grave indifference to human life. Now if you look at that smoking gun contract article that we went through before, Sars-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Corona Virus Pose Threat to Human Emergence, we went through that. It is clear that Fauci, [names] knew they were manifesting grave indifference to human life. Indeed, they had been told and they knew that this was extremely dangerous and hazardous. There is no question at all about. Indeed, that is why the Obama administration put a pause letter on this very dangerous, existentially dangerous type of gain-of-function work, whereupon Fauci and [name] then tried to white-wash it through [name] by running it through the Wuhan …so they knew that they were manifesting a grave indifference to human life, to human life. So yes, we have the elements for murder there. The unlawful killing of human being manifesting with malice of forethought of grave indifference to human life. And that is clear, again, that would be the case for [names] and their team, everyone signed onto that article we discussed before, Sars-like Cluster….

[Alex speaks]

44:15 So all of them on the basis of just this article and the history of it…in my opinion could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Now this is not going to happen by the federal government because the feds are all in on this with Biden and he controls the Department of Justice so what do you have to do?. Well, if you have lost a loved one as a result of the coronavirus pandemic you have to go to your local state’s attorney, district attorney, country prosecuter, or attorney general and demand that they convene a grand jury and present this evidence before a grand jury and seek an indictment for murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Now these local officials are accountable to you. They are elected by the people of the community and they are paid for by the people of the community and they can be re-elected or dis-elected by the people of the community. And so they are going to listen to you. So my advice here is that every one in this country, in the United States of America, who has lost a loved one, a million of them, as a result of this pandemic. go in person to their state’s attorney, district attorney, county prosecutor, attorney general, bring that article and all the other evidence that has accumulated in the public record, and demand that those local prosecutors convene a grand jury and present the case to a grand jury for indictments, for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, against [names] and everyone else that was involved in that project at the UNC BSL-3. This can be done. You have the power to do it. You will have to get organized to do it. Emails are not enough. My experience…lawyers, I hate to say, don’t pay all of that much attention to emails but they do pay attention to personal appearances by the people of the community who elect them and pay for them and re-elect them with solid evidence and get them to convene those grand juries and indict them for murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Now, you asked this other question about pre-meditation deliberation. I want to make it clear I do not support the death penalty. I’m a lifelong abolitionist myself and worked against the death penalty. But that means since we are a national law school here we train lawyers for all over the country I also have to lecture my law students, I have had to lecture on capital law offenses. A capital law offense death penalty in addition to what I have discussed with you so far, also requires on top of lawful killing of human beings with malice and forethought, premeditation and deliberation.

That is the additional element for capital law offense and clearly what we have here with [names], everyone else on UNC Team, this person from Harvard Medical School, this person from the Food and Drug Administration, which is why you can’t believe anything the FDA tells you, and Fauci and [name], I believe we have more than enough evidence here of premeditation deliberation. So if your state’s attorney, district attorney, county prosecutor, attorney general believes there is enough evidence there, sure, they can go for a capital offense as well. Fortunately, I live here in the state of Illinois and we do not have the death penalty. I oppose the death penalty. But as you know, other states in the union do have the death penalty. That would be how you proceed to make a capital offense against these individuals.

[Alex speaks]

50:35 image of statment based on Nuremberg Code

50:38 Right, well now I want to deal with the Frankenshots, Alex, how we can fight back on the Frankenshot. And the legal analysis is pretty much the same with the Frankenshots. Unlawful killing of a human being with malice of forethought. Unlawful. Let’s start with that on the Frankenshots. Clearly we have a violation of the Nuremberg Code on medical experimentation. And that is a Nuremberg Crime. And it is also a Nuremberg Crime against humanity. And this is the exact same statute we use to not prosecute Nazis at Nuremberg and let me read to you the appropriate passage from the Nuremberg Charter, Crimes Against Humannity, namely, murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts commited against any civilian population. Clearly, that is what is going on here with the Frankenshots. We have a Nuremberg Crime and a Nuremberg Crime against humanity. Second, the killing of a human being from the Frankenshots. Well, we don’t have the exact number here right now. The estimates are in the tens of thousands now of Americans who have been killed by means of these Frankenshots. There are different, I guess a lawsuit was just filed out there in California, a lawyer estimating…I haven’t seen the complaint there, the basis for his estimate. Killing of human beings with malice of forethought. All right. Here we get into two other variants of malice of forethought, namely, an intention to kill or an intention to cause grievous bodily harm. Now, maybe the manufacturers of the Frankenshot say, well, we didn’t really intend to kill anyone, but they clearly intended to cause grievous bodily harm, that is clear from the adverse incidents, the reactions now that are piling up, that have been documented in the VERS reports and also the European health agencies, but despite that, they are continuing to inflict Frankenshots on the American people despite these grave harm grievous harm to human bodies. So, yes, I think you can make out malice of forethought there, either intention to kill or intention to cause grievous bodily harm, so again, my advice, this would be a separate and second type of legal action, different from the legal action with respect to the Covid pandemic itself. I think this legal action would be after the …[names] those are the three Frankenshots administered here in the United States. Again, you would go into your state’s attorney, district attorney, county prosecutor, attorney general, and say, Look here, we have had in your jurisdiction my loved ones who were killed as a result of these Franknshots and you would have to produce this evidence. A coroner’s report or autopsy or something like that and therefore I want you to convene a grand jury and request the indictment of the chief exective officer [name],

[Alex speaks]

55:22 I’m dealing here with criminal accountability, Alex. The civil protection is not going to help these people. [names] for murder and conspiracy to commmit murder. And the state’s attorney, county prosecutor, district attorney, attorney general would assemble the case, convene a grand jury under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, they have a right, it’s a serious offense, to an indictment to a Grand Jury. So I’m not saying we should short circuit any legal due process here.

[Alex speaks]

57:48 Right. We’re now…Biden is going to recommend and soon require a third round of Frankenshots for everyone. So if the first two didn’t kill you, the third will get you for sure. But Alex, what I’ve just outlined here is what I believe common, ordinary, everyday American citizens can do to fight back now.

Go to your state’s attorney, district attorney, country prosecutor, attorney general, and demand they convene grand juries for both the Frankenshots and the pandemic itself. I think this can be done. It should be done. And if we start doing it now, we will be fighting back. We will be resisting and we will be going after the perpetrators for sure.

[Alex speaks]

58:55 That’s why I’m appearing here for you today, to outline this dual legal strategy, to go after the people behind the pandemic, to hold them legally accountable on a state and local basis, and also, the Frankenshots, to hold those people legally accountable on a state and local basis, and despite whatever civil immunity they might have, this is not going to protect them from criminal indictments for murder and conspiracy to commmit….

[Alex speaks]

59:52 Well, because we haven’t fought back yet. I’m here to explain how common, ordinary, everyday Americans can start to fight back. Indeed, there are some states in the Union, I know Massachusetts is one, where people can go into court and file their own criminal complaints…so if you have loved ones who have been killed, murdered, by either the pandemic or the Frankenshots, you have standing to go into the state’s attorney, district attorney, county attorney, and say “My loved one died in your jurisdiction, your jurisdiction here. It was murder. I want you to convene a grand jury and present the evidence to the grand jury.” Now of course, maybe the grand jury may not agree, but I think both you and I conclude the evidence is out there.

[Alex speaks]

61:41 My advice is that under military law you do not have any authorization to obey an illegal order. I’ve been involved myself over the years, Alex, in defending pro bono publico, five GI resisters against war or torture or war crimes. And you have no obligation to obey an illegal order, which in this case would be a violation of the Nuremberg Code of Medical Experimentation to take these Frankenshots. So, of course, you need to get yourself a lawyer. And we’ve discussed this before. I’ve dealt with JAG lawyers, I mean no disrespect to JAG lawyers, but at the end of the day they are in the chain of command. There is only so much they can do for you. So you need to get a lawyer, you can get a retired JAG lawyer or JAG judge or civilian counsel, willing to push the envelope for you and just invoke your rights in the Nuremberg Notice and say I am not going to follow this order because of…it’s an illegal order. Now then, what would happen is, if they want to introduce court martial proceedings, you have enormous protections under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Now, they, I’m just speaking my own personal experience. Obviously, it’s not what we would expect as civilians, but I think our UCMJ is pretty good if you’re a member of US armed forces, but you’re going to need a lawyer to assert all of your rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Now the last I’ve read, at least 30 percent or more of members of US armed forces who have so far not taken these Frankenshots. Well, imagine if 30% of US armed forces assert their right to disobey an illegal order in violation of the Nuremberg Code of Medical Experimentation, and say, “I’m very sorry, but under military law I have no obligation to obey an illegal order.” Then, what is the military going to do? Are they going to court martial 30% of US armed forces? I don’t know. But that would be the dilemma the military would be in today. Are they going to court martial 30% of US armed forces or not?

[Alex speaks]

64:50 And so again, if you want, I wrote a book, Protesting Power,…Resistance and War….that has a case in there on failure to obey an illegal order. And I won it. So this can be done.

[Alex speaks]

65:31 If you read my book…Protesting Power, War, Resistance, and Law…I wrote that for lawyers to explain to them, to lawyers, how to use international law, the laws of US Constitutional law, and human rights law, to defend GI resistors as a matter of principle. GI resisters who have opposed illegal criminal wars or war crimes or torture or things of this nature, or illegal orders. It’s all there in my book so all your lawyers have to do is get a copy of that book and read through it and they will know how to make out themselves this type of defense. I helped defend….who was the first military resistor to Bush Sr.’s, war against Iraq. And …refused to go to Saudi Arabia in August, right after the Bush Sr., was ordering US armed forces to Saudi Arabia, on the grounds that he believed this was just another US war for oil, which was of course, correct. But in any event, we defended him on the grounds that the Bush Sr., order to ship off to Saudi Arabia was not authorized by law, because it violated the War Powers clause of the Constitution and Congress’s 1973 War Powers Resolution. I was out there at…in Hawaii, for the court martial, it took about three hours, and the judge took the matter under advisement and …was dismissed from the marine corps. They did not want to go to the final court martial, to the formal court martial with the posture….

[Alex speaks]

68:01 So I’m just saying these are very complicated issues….

[Alex speaks]

68:19 But I think the grounds are for military personnel to say, I’m exercising my right under military law, not to obey an illegal order that will clearly violate here the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation and take these….

[Alex speaks]

68:55 And if it were to come to a court martial I think you would do quite well arguing that, but the point is, we are talking about massive resistance here by 30% of US forces who don’t want to take these Frankenshots, exercising their rights under US military law and saying I’m not going to do it. And then, if they are court martialed, they get civilian counsel and make these types of arguments that have successfully been made in military court martials….

[Alex speaks]

70:13 Well, we’re going to be living under a medical dictatorship, a totalitarian dictatorship for sure, so we have to fight back. That’s why I’m appearing here on your show today, to give the strategy. I’ve given three different strategies today, two for civilians on the pandemic and the Frankenshots and one for the military on the Frankenshots that they can use to fight back and resist the Frankenshots, yes.

[Alex speaks]

71:04 Not just saying no, but to fight back, legally as I am saying. I am not saying take up arms here, or anything like that, but based on my experience of legally this can be done, it should be done, I think we can succeed and we can fight back, yes.

[Alex speaks]

71:27 Well, that’s the strategy I had here, those three points I had, one for the military, two for civilians, and we can control this resistance at a state and local government, we do not have to rely on the federal government that is under the control of Biden and he’s working in cahoots with Fauci. He’s made that very clear. And I, myself, have been up against Biden twice, in my professional career, in his capacities as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The first time I beat him out, the second time I stopped what he was doing, and protected the interests of my people. You can’t believe anything Biden’s telling you. My experience is he’s a very ruthless, cunning, despite the “uncle Joe” type image, he’s very ruthless, cunning, unprincipled, typical machine type politician, and we now see that in the tyranny of Biden imposing the Frankenshots to whatever extent he can and then also basically hijacking those in the private sector to impose these Frankenshots. So again, for our future and the future of our children, we have to resist the Frankenshots and we have to fight back against the instigators of the pandemic.

[Alex speaks]

74:37 It’s the next step, as I said, it’s establishing a totalitarian dictatorship here in the United States. We do not need any type of domestic terrorism statute. We have already enough statutes on the books to deal with whatever acts might be the case. You’re correct in pointing out this concept of domestic terrorism in the United States would simply be used by the United States Federal government to repress and persecute any type of dissent against United States government federal policies. I listened to Attorney General Garland’s speech on this, and he was completely disingenuous. He tried to cover up the fact that the Levi guidelines still apply to the FBI. They do not. I think we discussed this before on one of the many interviews we gave years ago. The Levi guidelines were established by Attorney General Edward Levi to try to stop FBI co-intel operations, which is, as you know, is basically infiltration of what otherwise might be peaceful, law-abiding groups exercising their first amendments, and encourage them to commit illegal activities, agent provocateurs. And that’s…was all about, that came out in the war game hearings, the church hearings, and all the scandels related to that, so President Ford appointed Levi. Levi had been Dean at the University of Chicago Law School when I was an undergrad there, so I followed this quite closely and Levi adopted the Levi guidelines that were supposed to eliminate co-intel. I don’t know if they did or they didn’t, because I suspect the FBI was still out there…but they did rein them in seriously. Now everyone knows after 9-11-2001, the Attorney General Ashcroft, who went to the University of Chicago Law School, probably when Levi was Dean, revoked the Levi guidelines. Everyone knows that. And the FBI was back into co-intel pro-operations ever since….

[Alex Jones speaks]

77:43 [Dr. Boyle][definion of co-intel] Spying, agent provacateur, entrapment

[Alex Jones speaks] war on domestic political opposition

78:00 So Garland, in his speech, covered for the FBI, and said, well, as we all know, the FBI has been adhering to the Levi guidelines since they were promulgated. That’s a total lie. Everyone knows that Ashcroft repudiated the Levi guidelines and the FBI has been involved in co-intel operations ever since Ashcroft after 9-11 repudiated them. They have inflicted massive cointel operations on Muslims all over the United States. And this is not to excuse any type of violent activity here.

[Alex Jones speaks]

79:08 Right, well, as I told you before they put me on the US government’s terrorist watch list because I refused to become an informant to the FBI and CIA on my Arab/Muslim clients in violation of their Constitutional rights….

[Alex Jones speaks]

79:34 Well, they came right to my office at the law school, right, I mean, can you believe that? Agents of the FBI and the CIA come to the office of a law professor….

[Alex Jones speaks]

79:50 But the point is, domestic terrorism is being used to oppose any resistance to what the United States federal government might want to do. We don’t need any domestic terrorism statutes. This is just, as you said, Orwellian. Even after the anti-terrorism… as a result of the bombing of the Murray Federal Building, there was more than enough on the books there to deal with domestic terrorism. And then, after 9-11-2001, they adopted the USA Patriot Act which basically set up an American police state which is what we live under today. There is no question about it. I’ve lectured to lawyers on the USA Patriot Act. And so this will be the next step, domestic terrorism to use to go after peaceful, non-violent American citizens left, right, middle, excercising their First Amendment rights to oppose whatever policies the US federal government is engaged in, like today the Frankenshots, this is domestic terrorism and we will have to prosecute them.

[Alex speaks]

83:52 Alex, remember, at the very beginning of our conversations I did mention how lethal I thought the Wuhan coronavirus was, I said it was about in the area of 15%, I noticed that in his last interchange with Dr. Fauci, Senator Ron Paul also said 15%….

[Alex Jones speaks]

84:26 I don’t know if Senator Paul was listening to me or not, as you know, Senator Paul is a medical doctor, he’s an opthamalogist, that’s a highly specialized area of medicine, board certified….

[Alex Jones speaks]

84:51 Right, so Senator Paul said 15% and that is what I said originally, and I know one of your collegues said he thought that was an exaggeration, but this is extremely dangerous, and yes, we have to treat it that way, and again, that’s why I appeared here on your show today, to come up with three different strategies for fighting back here. One, the indictment at state and local basis against Fauci and [names] and the rest of them for murder and the conspiracy to commit murder. Second, a separate indictment against…the CEOs there at [names] for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, and the third legal strategy for members of our US armed forces who don’t want to take the Frankenshots. So we’re all in this together. We have to fight back together. Yes, we also have to resist this whole concept of domestic terrorism that is going to be turned against all of us. As far as the US government is concerned, I’m a domestic terrorist. When I applied to get out my social security benefits, I filled out the form online. No problem. And what happened? I got a call from the social security agency up there in Chicago, well, you’re on the computer alert system here and you are going to have to go into a personal interview to social security down here in Champaign, so I had to in there to a personal interview for about an hour, and convince the social security agent that I was not a terrorist. I kid you not. This is what is going on in this country. If they’ve done this to me, you can imagine what they are going to do to you. We have to fight back. We have to stop the pandemic. We have to top the Frankenshot. We must stop the further devlopment of a totalitarian police state that is clearly coming under the guise of this medical tyrrany. I mean, you can just listen to Fauci. He speaks out of both sides of his mouth.

[Alex speaks]

87:40 The two-front war was the pandemic and the Frankenshots and now I say it’s this whole notion of domestic terrorism. Like I said, we don’t need any concept of domestic terrorism here in the United States. We do not need a law. There are more than enough laws on the books. My guess is that under the currently operative cointel pro, the FBI has everyone…

[Alex speaks]

89:25 Well, to give an example, when the FBI and CIA came to interrogate me in my own law office, the first question was, why are you giving all these interviews all over the world? So much for the First Amendment, right? They couldn’t care less.

[Alex speaks]

89:49 I feel,…they didn’t care about the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Sixth Amendment, the Seventh Amendment, just in my case alone. This is what we are dealing with. The FBI is completely out of anyone’s control….

[Alex speaks]

90:55 Well, that’s correct. You should never meet with any of these people without having a lawyer with you, that’s correct.

[Alex] Well, they don’t tell you…they’re really an operative.

91:14 Sure, after 9-11-2001, there has been, before then, a Presidential Order that covert agents should not be members of the press and working with the press and things of that nature, and after 9-11-2001, Bush Jr., lifted that order, so you have to understand if you are dealing with the media you could be dealing with some kind of covert agent, that is correct.

[Alex speaks]

92:17 Well, I guess they just don’t care, Alex. They have all the power and they figure they can get away with it, and that’s what’s happening. But the real dangers here are the Frankenshots. Biden’s now going… they will recommend and soon they’re going to require a third round of Frankenshots for everyone. That’s going to kill a lot of people off that they haven’t killed off already. Remember, based on my experience, having defended pro bono publico…who refused to give the Frankenshots in Gulf War One out of 500,000, and these are ball park figures because the Pentagon still lies about them, because they know they committed a Nuremberg crime on our own troops, but out 500,000 troops innoculated, 11,000 were killed, 100,000 were disabled, and those were healthy young men and women in the US armed forces so you can extrapolate from there what a third round of these Frankenshots is going to so to people. Gulf War sickness…we are seeing massive adverse reactions to the current covid frankenshots, and it’s just begun. As I said before, it took me two years to figure out that the Gulf War Frankenshots produced this humanitarian catastrophe known as the Gulf War Syndrome, the Gulf War sickness, and those Frankenshots also, they infected health care workers, and …members of family, and that indicated that there was a biological warfare agent at work, probably going back to those first Gulf War frankenshots, so I’m afraid, certainly, in the next two years, if we don’t stop these frankenshots now, who knows how many will die and how many will be disabled.

[Alex speaks]

95:08 They’re going for broke, Alex, I think that’s all we can say is going on here. This is massive push by the financial elite, the power elite, and they’re going for all the power, this is it.

[Alex speaks]

95:31 Well, you can just hit my name on Google or Amazon and all the books will come out but for the members of the US armed forces and their lawyers, the important book is, Protesting Power, War, Resistance, and Law and it explains how to make these arguments in US military court martial proceedings. It’s basically written to lawyers, but you can read it on your own. And certainly, if 30% of US armed forces can say I’m not taking the Frankenshot, I have a right under US military law to resist an illegal order, and you know, if you’re going to court martial me, so be it, and then you proceed to exercise all the rights you have under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, well if 30% of US armed forces do that, the whole system will break down.

[Alex speaks] We’re going to post an archive of this at inforwars.com, freeworldnews.tv

97:00 Thanks for having me, Alex, to get the message out to all of my fellow American citizens who are in dire danger now from these Frankenshots. We must resist. And also the members of our military who also are in grave danger here. They have to resist too.

[related link found to article referenced above]  [https://childrenshealthdefense.org/research_db/sars-like-cluster-of-circulating-bat-coronavirus-pose-threat-for-human-emergence/ ]

Romans 10:9 that if you will confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart, one believes resulting in righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made resulting in salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes in him will not be disappointed.” 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, and is rich to all who call on him. 13 For, “Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved.”