“‘the scale of that scandal would be enormous’”

Project Veritas: Pfizer Director Concerned Over Women’s Reproductive Health After Covid Vax, ‘There is Something Irregular About Menstrual Cycles’ (VIDEO)

Continue Reading

The “How-To Guide” for a “‘strategic sleight-of-hand'”

BUSTED: Dr. Deborah Birx Admits She Manipulated Data and Altered CDC Guidelines to Deceive President Trump

 

Continue Reading

2 Teen Boys Die

Autopsy Analysis of 2 Teen Boys Who Died Days After 2nd Pfizer Covid Shot Finds ‘Global Myocardial Injury’

Continue Reading

American Airline Pilot Speaks Out

American Airlines Pilot Blames FAA Vaccine Mandate For Heart Attack Suffered Just Minutes After Landing Commercial Flight

 

Continue Reading

Repost by Permission: World War III Already Started—Covid 19 Was First Weapon Fired

World War III Already Started—Covid 19 Was First Weapon Fired

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A mind-blowing new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting President Putin set a mission for the Ministry of Defense (MoD) to eliminate the possibility of Ukraine targeting Russian border regions, says afterwards Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov observed: “Ukraine’s foreign sponsors are getting more bogged down in the conflict with every step…Now our goal is to push the artillery of the Ukrainian Armed Forces back to a distance, where they would not create a threat to our territories…The longer range the weapons supplied to the Kiev regime have, the further the troops will need to be moved”.

As Ukraine continues to be obliterated in a conflict it has already lost, this report notes, it caused Foreign Intelligence Service Director Sergey Naryshkin to assess: “If we talk about Russia, then, of course, we wouldn’t want to wage war to the last Ukrainian…We understand that most of the population of Ukraine are normal people, who want to live a peaceful life, but those people became both hostages and victims of the totalitarian Kiev regime, and victims of the aggressive policies of the NATO bloc…This US-led military alliance poses the main threat to stability and security in Europe and beyond”—an assessment that followed President Donald Trump proclaiming to the American peoples: “Such a tragic waste of human life when you look at all that’s happening there, those cities are obliterated…First come the tanks and then come the nukes…Get this crazy war ended now!”.

With Western military analysts now reporting: “NATO has disarmed its ground forces and is no longer combat capable”, this report continues, it follows the American government “newspaper of record” leftist Washington Post rushing out its article “Blinken Ponders The Post-Ukraine-War Order” written by David Ignatius, who’s otherwise known as a top “Deep State Mouthpiece”—an article directly aimed at Russian leadership quickly responded to by world-renowned Brazilian geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar, who, in his just released open letter “A Panicked Empire Tries To Make Russia “An Offer It Can’t Refuse””, assessed:

Realizing NATO’s war with Russia will likely end unfavorably, the US is test-driving an exit offer.  But why should Moscow take indirect proposals seriously, especially on the eve of its new military advance and while it is in the winning seat?

Those behind the Throne are never more dangerous than when they have their backs against the wall.

Their power is slipping awayfast: Militarily, via NATO’s progressive humiliation in Ukraine; Financially, sooner rather than later, most of the Global South will want nothing to do with the currency of a bankrupt rogue giant; Politically, the global majority is taking decisive steps to stop obeying a rapacious, discredited, de facto minority.

So now those behind the Throne are plotting to at least try to stall the incoming disaster on the military front.

As confirmed by a high-level US establishment source, a new directive on NATO vs. Russia in Ukraine was relayed to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.  Blinken, in terms of actual power, is nothing but a messenger boy for the Straussian neocons and neoliberals who actually run US foreign policy.

The secretary of state was instructed to relay the new directive – a sort of message to the Kremlin – via mainstream print media, which was promptly published by the Washington Post.

In the elite US mainstream media division of labor, the New York Times is very close to the State Departmentand the Washington Post to the CIA.  In this case though the directive was too important, and needed to be relayed by the paper of record in the imperial capital.  It was published as an Op-Ed (behind paywall).

The novelty here is that for the first time since the start of Russia’s February 2022 Special Military Operation (SMO) in Ukraine, the Americans are actually proposing a variation of the “offer you can’t refuse” classic, including some concessions which may satisfy Russia’s security imperatives.

Crucially, the US offer totally bypasses Kiev, once again certifying that this is a war against Russia conducted by Empire and its NATO minions – with the Ukrainians as mere expandable proxies.

The message from Washington may, at first glance, give the impression that the US would admit Russian control over Crimea, Donbass, Zaporozhye, and Kherson – “the land bridge that connects Crimea and Russia” – as a fait accompli.

Ukraine would have a demilitarized status, and the deployment of HIMARS missiles and Leopard and Abrams tanks would be confined to western Ukraine, kept as a “deterrent against further Russian attacks”.

What may have been offered, in quite hazy terms, is in fact a partition of Ukraine, demilitarized zone included, in exchange for the Russian General Staff cancelling its yet-unknown 2023 offensive, which may be as devastating as cutting off Kiev’s access to the Black Sea and/or cutting off the supply of NATO weapons across the Polish border.

The US offer defines itself as the path towards a “just and durable peace that upholds Ukraine’s territorial integrity”.  Well, not really.  It just won’t be a rump Ukraine, and Kiev might even retain those western lands that Poland is dying to gobble up.

The possibility of a direct Washington-Moscow deal on “an eventual postwar military balance” is also evoked, including no Ukraine membership of NATO.  As for Ukraine itself, the Americans seem to believe it will be a “strong, non-corrupt economy with membership in the European Union”.

Whatever remains of value in Ukraine has already been swallowed not only by its monumentally corrupt oligarchy, but most of all, investors and speculators of the BlackRock variety. Assorted corporate vultures simply cannot afford to lose Ukraine’s grain export ports, as well as the trade deal terms agreed with the EU before the war.  And they’re terrified that the Russian offensive may capture Odessa, the major seaport and transportation hub on the Black Sea – which would leave Ukraine landlocked.

There’s no evidence whatsoever that Russian President Vladimir Putin, and the entire Russian Security Council – including its Secretary Nikolai Patrushev and Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev – have reason to believe anything coming from the US establishment, especially via mere minions such as Blinken and the Washington Post.  After all the stavka – a moniker for the high command of the Russian armed forces – regard the Americans as “non-agreement capable,” even when an offer is in writing.

This walks and talks like a desperate US gambit to stall and present some carrots to Moscow in the hope of delaying or even cancelling the planned offensive of the next few months.

Even old school, dissident Washington operatives – not beholden to the Straussian neocon galaxy – bet that the gambit will be a nothing burger: in classic “strategic ambiguity” mode, the Russians will continue on their stated drive of demilitarization, denazification and de-electrification, and will “stop” anytime and anywhere they see fit east of the Dnieper.  Or beyond.

Shortly after the FBI searched the Delaware beach home of Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden for classified documents yesterday, this report notes, the leftist Washington Post reported: “Hunter Biden’s lawyers, in a newly aggressive strategy, sent a series of blistering letters Wednesday to state and federal prosecutors urging criminal investigations into those who accessed and disseminated his personal data — and sent a separate letter threatening Fox News host Tucker Carlson with a defamation lawsuit…The string of letters, which included criminal referrals and cease-and-desist missives aimed at critics and detractors, marked the start of a new and far more hard-hitting phase for the president’s son just as House Republicans prepare their own investigations into him….Abbe Lowell, a recently hired lawyer whom Biden enlisted about a month ago, sent lengthy letters to the Justice Department and Delaware’s attorney general requesting investigations into several key players who were involved in disseminating data from a laptop that Biden is said to have dropped off at a repair shop in Wilmington, Del.”.

Most astonishing to notice about the “aggressive strategy” to suppress information these lawyers are using, this report concludes, is that it involves the laptop computer Hunter Biden abandoned in a repair shop—right before the 2020 presidential election, however, the American intellignece community, leftist media and tech giants branded this laptop as “Russian disinformation” while censoring all information about it—as to why it is now being admitted that this laptop belongs to Hunter Biden is because information contained on it has led to articles published this week like “Burisma-Connected Oligarch Who Funded Zelensky’s Campaign, Acting Career Raided By Ukrainian Security Forces” and “Zelensky Sent Out Government Decree to Destroy ALL INFORMATION on Hunter Biden’s Metabiota Company on Same Day as Russian Invasion – Then Fire Spotted Outside Intel Headquarters”—and most critical to notice is that right before Hunter Biden’s lawyers began their information suppression actions, Twitter reinstated the feared bioethics whistleblower @WarClandestine account, that was suspended last year after it linked both Obama and Biden to biowarfare labs in Ukraine, and after reinstated, posted the thread “Why The US Is REALLY Sending Weapons To Ukraine” (Complete threat posted below), wherein it beyond shockingly exposes the true history of Ukraine and what the present conflict is really about, and concludes: “Tanks, jets, weapons, equipment, $100+ billion in taxpayer funds, the lives of the Ukrainian people…All worthy sacrifices in the eyes of the Deep State…Whatever it takes to cover up their bioweapons production…World War 3 already started…Covid 19 was the first weapon fired”.  [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

ts a

February 2, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

Continue Reading

“Dragon Slayer”

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-02-01-health-freedom-advocate-jonathan-emord-senate-virginia.html

 

 

 

Continue Reading

“Power Over Medical Schools”

https://dailycaller.com/2023/02/01/med-school-went-woke-after-pressure-from-accreditor-documents-show/

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Market Timing

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/84053/bill-gates-secured-hundreds-of-millions-in-profits-from-mrna-stock-sales-before-suddenly-changing.html

 

 

Continue Reading

Jimmy Kimmel and Mike Lindell

Watch Mike Lindell outclass and out-funny Jimmy Kimmel like a boss…

Continue Reading

Repost by Permission: American Domino Game Lost In Vietnam Meets Same Fate Against Russia

February 1, 2023

American Domino Game Lost In Vietnam Meets Same Fate Against Russia

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An insightful new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting the decree signed by President Putin to ban Russian oil sales to entities that require compliance with socialist Western colonial price caps came into full force this morning, says this price cap was actually nonsensical because the budget was drawn up on the basis of $44 per barrel of oil, and shortly after this ban came into force it was reported: “Export shipments of Russian crude have risen substantially this month, with most of these leaving on Western-insured tankers thanks to prices…Oil loadings from PrimorskUst-Luga, and Novorosiisk are set to top 9.5 million tons in total this month as Urals, Russia’s flagship blend drops below $50, when the price cap set by the G7 and the EU is $60 per barrel”.

In yet another nonsensical move, this report notes, yesterday the socialist Biden Regime accused Russia of not complying with its obligations under the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, the only remaining treaty limiting the world’s two largest nuclear arsenals signed by former Russian and American presidents Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama—and in quick response to this nonsensical accusation, Ambassador Anatoly Antonov factually pointed out: “These actions concern the central limits of New START, undermining the key goal of the agreement – to maintain the balance of the parties strategic offensive arms…Russia has always impeccably observed the provisions of the New START treaty…It was Washington that had violated the accords by illegitimately withdrawing more than a hundred strategic weapons from accountability under the treaty…We have repeatedly pointed out to Washington that the situation around START is a direct result of the hybrid war unleashed by the West against our country…We warned them that arms control could not be isolated from geopolitical realities…In the current conditions, we consider it unjustified, untimely, and inappropriate to invite the US military to our strategic facilities”.

In further explaining why it’s nonsensical for the socialist Biden Regime to believe Russia would allow American military inspectors to inspect Russia nuclear weapon strategic facilities, this report continues, top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov most factually observed: “We see how NATO’s entire military infrastructure is working against Russia, and we see how NATO’s entire intelligence infrastructure, including reconnaissance aviation, and satellite groupings are working in the interests of Ukraine in a 24/7 mode…Such actions create very peculiar, hostile conditions for Russia which Moscow cannot help but notice”—and is a factual observation that follows Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov factually assessing: “It is obvious that the United States is not only the main conductor in the Ukraine crisis, but also its main beneficiary…Among other things, Washington considers Ukraine as a testing ground for its military-industrial products, where various weapons systems and methods of their use, including modern, very long-range ones, are being tested for resistance to Russian weapons”.

With European Union members Austria and Hungary announcing they won’t send weapons to Ukraine, this report details, it caused German Chancellor Olaf Scholz to travel to the Global South for support yesterday, but during a brutal press conference, he was slapped down by Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who stated: “I think the reason for the war between Russia and Ukraine also needs to be clearer…Is it because of NATO?…Is it because of territorial claims?…Is it because of entry into Europe?….The world has little information about that”.

As to why the socialist Western colonial powers are fighting against Russia, this report notes, was made clear by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who yesterday proclaimed: “If President Putin wins in Ukraine, this would send a message that authoritarian regimes can achieve their goals through brute force…This is dangerous…Beijing is watching closely…And learning lessons that may influence its future decisions…What is happening in Europe today could happen in East Asia tomorrow…So we must remain united and firm…Standing together for freedom and democracy”—but in factual reality, this was a “Domino Theory proclamation, about which history now records: The domino theory was a Cold War policy that suggested a communist government in one nation would quickly lead to communist takeovers in neighboring states, each falling like a row of dominos…In Southeast Asia, the U.S. government used the now-discredited domino theory to justify its involvement in the Vietnam War and its support for a non-communist dictator in South Vietnam”.

Among those noticing that the socialist Biden Regime and its Western colonial allies have trotted out the discredited “Domino Theory” to justify their warmongering against Russia, this report concludes, is Russian historical writer Matthieu Buge, who, in his just released open letter “50 Years After Leaving Vietnam, The US Keeps Getting Involved In Wars Without Understanding Them”, observed: “Former US Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara only came to understand in the 1990’s when he met with Vietnamese General Vo Nguyen Giap…With astonishment, he suddenly realized that the Vietnamese were fighting a war of independence, not an ideological war…The 20-year conflict in Vietnam had never been about the spread of communism in the world…Concerning US foreign policy, the elderly and experienced politician went on to say: “We don’t understand the Bosnians, we don’t understand the Chinese, and we don’t really understand the Iranians”…With the exception of colonized Western Europe, it seems to be a good summary of Washington’s policy towards countries all over the world”—and is an observation concurred with by American diplomat James Carden, a former adviser to the US-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission at the United States Department of State, who, in his just released open letter “Ukraine Proves We Learned Nothing From The Vietnam War”, assessed:

Only hours after the successful conclusion of the First Gulf War, President George H.W. Bush declared, “By God, we’ve kicked the Vietnam syndrome once and for all”.

And kick it Bush did: In the decades following his 1991 pronouncement, the United States has been at war in one form or another (either as a belligerent or unofficial co-belligerent—as is the case with our involvement in Saudi Arabia’s grotesque war on Yemen) for all but two of the 32 years that have followed.

Yet the atmosphere that now prevails in Washington makes it exceedingly difficult to believe such a thing as a “Vietnam Syndrome” ever existed.  Indeed, President Joe Biden’s handling of the war in Ukraine has been met with rapturous approval from the Washington establishment, winning plaudits from all the usual suspects.

But can the Biden policy truly be credited as a success when the entire ordeal might have been avoided by judicious diplomatic engagement?  Are we really to believe that the war which so far has resulted in 8 million refugees and roughly 200,000 battlefield deaths has been worth a promise of NATO membership for Ukraine?

Conspicuous by its absence in what passes for foreign policy discourse in the American capital is the question of American interests: How does the allocation of vast sums to a wondrously corrupt regime in Kiev in any way materially benefit everyday Americans?

Does the imposition of a narrow, sectarian Galician nationalism over the whole of Ukraine truly constitute a core American interest?  Does the prolongation of a proxy war between NATO and Russia further European and American security interests?  If so, how?

In truth, the lessons of Vietnam were forgotten long ago.  The generation that now populates the ranks of the Washington media and political establishment came of age when Vietnam was already in the rearview mirror.

The unabashed liberal interventionists who staff the Biden administration cut their teeth in the 1990s when it was commonly believed that the U.S. didn’t act often enough, notably in Bosnia and in Rwanda.  As such, and almost without exception, the current crop of foreign policy hands now in power have supported every American mis-adventure abroad since 9/11.

The caution which, albeit all-too-temporarily, stemmed from the ‘Vietnam Syndrome’ is today utterly absent from the corridors of power in Joe Biden’s Washington.

The Vietnam Syndrome is indeed kicked: Dead and buried.

But we may soon come to regret its passing.

[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

February 1, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

Continue Reading
Romans 10:9 that if you will confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart, one believes resulting in righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made resulting in salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes in him will not be disappointed.” 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, and is rich to all who call on him. 13 For, “Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved.”