Repost: Shocking: 1992 Book Predicts Current World Crises, Points to “Post-Industrial” World by 2050

Shocking: 1992 Book Predicts Current World Crises, Points to “Post-Industrial” World by 2050

Continue Reading

Repost: I Thought It Was a Joke

I Thought It Was a Joke

Continue Reading

Repost: Drug Safety Expert Calls For Immediate Suspension of COVID Shots: Causing ‘Deaths of Young People and Children’

Drug Safety Expert Calls For Immediate Suspension of COVID Shots: Causing ‘Deaths of Young People and Children’

Continue Reading

Repost: Tucker: This is a matter of national survival

Original Post

Continue Reading

Repost by Permission: Biden Forgot Russia Can Produce More Arms And Ammunition Than The Entire West

January 30, 2023

Biden Forgot Russia Can Produce More Arms And Ammunition Than The Entire West

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A thought-provoking new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov revealing to reporters this morning: “As for NATO and contact, we don’t have any…You know that, in fact, at one time NATO stopped any kind of meaningful communication with our country. Therefore, it is very difficult to talk about such contact at the moment”, says NATO stopped its contacts shortly after Russian military forces conducting the “Special De-Nazification Operation” began seizing evidence of secret American biowarfare activities in Ukraine, about which the Ministry of Defense (MoD) revealed today: “Over the period of the special military operation, Russian troops have secured over 20,000 documents, references and analytical materials, and interviewed eyewitnesses and participants in American military-biological programs”—and as it pertains to these seized American biowarfare documents, General Igor Kirillov further revealed today: “The aforementioned materials confirm the Pentagon’s intention to create biological weapons components and test them on the population of Ukraine and other countries along the perimeter of our borders…As part of activities to wind down military biological operations in Ukraine, the United States are proactively engaging the material base of chemical and pharmacological plants of Poland and the Baltic States; furthermore, equipment from the Ukrainian territory was delivered there”.

According to a new BBC documentary set for broadcast today, this report notes, disgraced and ousted from power former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson ludicrously claimed about a phone conversation he had with President Putin last year: “He sort of threatened me at one point and said, ‘Boris, I don’t want to hurt you, but with a missile, it would only take a minute’, or something like that”—a ludicrous claim joined with the fact: “No reference to the alleged exchange between Johnson and Putin appeared in accounts of the call given by either Downing Street or the Kremlin, the BBC makes clear”—in quick response, top Kremlin spokesman Peskov factually stated: “What Mr. Johnson said is not true; more precisely, it is a lie”—and as to why President Putin barely even thinks about either Britain or its socialist leaders, is best explained in the just published Sky News article “US General Warns British Army No Lonter Top-Level Fighting Force, Defense Sources Reveal”, wherein it states:

A senior US general has privately told Defence Secretary Ben Wallace the British Army is no longer regarded as a top-level fighting force, defence sources have revealed.

The general used a term to rank the strength of a country’s military, with tier one regarded as a top-level power such as the United States, Russia, China and France and a status the UK also seeks to hold.

Tier two would describe a more middling power with less fighting capability such as Germany or Italy.

According to the sources, the general, referring to the army, said: “You haven’t got a tier one. It’s barely tier two“.

Offering a sense of the scale of the challenge faced by the army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force, it is understood that:

1.) The armed forces would run out of ammunition “in a few days” if called upon to fight

2.) The UK lacks the ability to defend its skies against the level of missile and drone strikes that Ukraine is enduring

3.) It would take five to 10 years for the army to be able to field a war-fighting division of some 25,000 to 30,000 troops backed by tanks, artillery and helicopters

4.) Some 30% of UK forces on high readiness are reservists who are unable to mobilise within NATO timelines – “so we’d turn up under strength

5.) The majority of the army’s fleet of armoured vehicles, including tanks, was built between 30 to 60 years ago and full replacements are not due for years

Along with British military forces not posing a real threat to Russia, this report concludes, the American think tank The Heritage Foundation, in its “2023 Index of U.S. Military Strength”, grimly assessed: “The US military may not be able to win one war — let alone two — as the Pentagon struggles to keep its forces equipped against potential threats from China and Russia…Years of underfunding and poorly defined priorities has led the military to become weak relative to the force needed to defend national interests on the global stage…The current U.S. military force is at significant risk of not being able to meet the demands of a single major regional conflict…The force would probably not be able to do more and is certainly ill-equipped to handle two nearly simultaneous major conflicts”—a grim assessment ignored by Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden as he keeps dangerously provoking Russia, that has the world’s largest natural resources valued at over $75 trillion making it impossible to sanction, and he also forgot the facts just documented by historian Christopher Roach of the Center for American Greatness research institute, who, in his just released open letter “Wunderwaffen Won’t Save Ukraine”, assessed and observed:

In the summer of 1944, the Soviet Army destroyed Germany’s Army Group Center with a massive counteroffensive.  The simultaneous invasion of France by allied forces and the continuation of the American thrust through Italy put additional pressure on Germany, which was forced to fight on three fronts.

Throughout the war, the Germans undeniably had more sophisticated and superior weapons, including their Panther and Tiger tanks.  They also developed jet fighters, as well as the first cruise and ballistic missiles.  In addition to these technical advantages, the German Wehrmacht had an innovative and decentralized system of tactics and maintained rigorous training for officers through the end of the war.

Even so, in spite of such qualitative superiority, by 1944 it was obvious Germany was going to lose.  Israeli historian Omer Bartov goes further and argues that Germany was destined to lose the war from the moment it invaded the Soviet Union.  Germany’s chief disadvantage was the size, or rather lack of size, of its population and economy, compared to the combined might and numbers of the British, American, and Soviet empires.

As Germany retreated from its high-water mark in 1942, many Germans consoled themselves with rumors that Hitler was setting a trap.  The rumor went as follows: as soon as the Germans appeared to be defeated, they would unleash a fusillade of Wunderwaffen, i.e., wonder weapons, which would turn the tide, exact revenge on the allies, and lead to a German victory.

No such victory would be forthcoming.  In a war of attrition, numbers, supply chains, and mass end up counting for more than the quality of armaments and other technological advantages. As Paul Kennedy famously argued in The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers,

“The triumph of any one Great Power in this period, or the collapse of another, has usually been the consequence of lengthy fighting by its armed forces; but it has also been the consequences of the more or less efficient utilization of the state’s productive economic resources in wartime, and, further in the background, of the way in which that state’s economy had been rising or falling, relative to the other leading nations, in the decades preceding the actual conflict.”

A similar dynamic is currently underway in Ukraine.  Russia, the supposed basket case nation with an economy “the size of Italy’s”, has not only survived, but turned the tide, in spite of crushing Western sanctions.  Talk of a winter offensive by the Ukrainian army has disappeared, as casualties mount and Russia surrounds concentrated Ukrainian forces.

American media seem confused, but this is probably because very little of this war is “telegenic” when compared to the American Gulf War.  Rather, this is a war of attrition, where artillery is predominant, the battles are slow and dirty, and the chief technological marvel is the widespread use of cheap drones to augment the abilities of forward observers.

Russia’s industrial age economy is apparently well suited for a war of attrition, as Russia has the ability to produce both food and other necessities for her people, while also producing tanks, endless kamikaze drones, and an order-of-magnitude more artillery shells than its opponent.  Meanwhile, Ukraine’s economy is destroyed, with its government payroll and military budget entirely dependent on Western subsidies.

Not only can Russia produce more than Ukraine, but it turns out, at least for now, that it can produce more arms and ammunition than the entire West.  Having offshored much of its dual-use industrial infrastructure to China in service to globalization over the last 20 years, the West’s military industrial complex is now only optimized for profits.  Western leaders mistook economic activity measured by GDP with productive capacity.

Thus, the United States and NATO can produce very sophisticated weapons systems like the F-35 and the Patriot missile, but can only do so slowly and expensively.  Like German industry producing sophisticated, but delicate and expensive tanks during World War II, the western arms industry is not optimized for either speed or volume.  It will take years to catch up.

By contrast, Russia has followed its successful World War II practice of producing many good (but not great) weapons, which are simple and reliable, like the T-90 tank.  Moreover, Russia appears to possess domestic factories and techniques to produce mountains of artillery shells, which are now pulverizing the large numbers of Ukrainian forces gathered in Bakhmut.

Trying to provide a qualitative advantage, the West has showered Ukraine with its most advanced weapons.  Any initial reluctance to provoke Russia has been reduced piecemeal. After earlier supplying HIMARS, artillery pieces, anti-tank missiles, and armored personnel carriers, this week, the United States promised to provide Ukraine some of its M1 Abrams tanks—widely regarded as the best tank in the world.  America’s commitment of the Abrams tank encouraged the Germans to provide their own Leopard 2 tanks. In all, it appears a little over 100 modern tanks will be sent to Ukraine from NATO countries.

For all of the ways this move has provoked Russia, and for all the optimism and excitement that has stirred in the pro-Ukraine press, it is questionable whether these tanks will change the outcome of the war.  There is at present a several-hundred-mile-long front, with several hundred thousand men and thousands of tanks and armored vehicles deployed on opposite sides.  The promised modern tanks are sophisticated, require intensive maintenance, and lengthy training of crews, and the West can only supply a handful of them.

This is all similar to the situation facing the Wehrmacht in 1944.  Allied tanks—the Soviet T-34 and the American M4 Sherman—had inferior main guns, less armor, and lower performance than the German Tigers and Panthers.  Similarly, the allies had nothing like the German V1 or V2 rockets, which were significantly ahead of their time.  The Germans had even developed the world’s first assault rifle.

But, in spite of all this innovation, massive numbers of American and Soviet tanks, along with rising numbers of trained troops, all supported by coordinated industrial power, were able to overwhelm the German military completely.

The West and its leaders are either engaged in massive denial or they are deliberately destroying their limited reserves of weapons and ammunition for some nefarious purpose. There is currently no prospect of Ukrainian victory, and a few hundred Wunderwaffen are not going to change the outcome.  Even the highest U.S. military leaders have begun to express reservations, though they were initially very supportive and optimistic about the Ukraine campaign.

While having little prospect of success, the latest move risks at least two bad outcomes. First, having put its prestige on the line, the West may now be committed to Ukraine simply to avoid “losing face,” much like the United States stuck it out in Vietnam and Afghanistan long after any plausible national security advantage was in view.  Second, not appreciating the repeated nuclear threats from Russia, the West may unintentionally cross a red line, setting off a chain reaction that could lead to Armageddon itself.

After committing massive and widespread atrocities in the Soviet Union, the German army knew that surrender was not an option in 1944 and also knew they could not prevail.  So, instead of preparing the German people for reality, they seduced them with fanciful accounts of counterattacks in the Ardennes and salvation through Wunderwaffen.  This only served to boost morale until the inevitable conclusion.

The United States is not so constrained.  There is still the prospect for diplomacy and negotiation to resolve the war in Ukraine.  But nothing about Joe Biden or his administration suggests either the wisdom or restraint to take such a course.  Further, Republicans are not interested in restraining Biden because of their own militarism and the lingering influence of the neoconservatives.  Beyond a little grumbling about the price tag, Americans from both parties also do not appear terribly interested in the matter.

This is all ominous.  But it would not be the first time a great power sealed its fate through hubris, historical illiteracy, and self-destructive leadership.

[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

January 30, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

Continue Reading

Repost: Pfizer Director Assaults James O’Keefe & Veritas Staff; Destroys iPad Showing Undercover Recordings

Original Post

The above excerpted video is also referenced on this video from Brighteon.


Continue Reading

Repost by Permission: American War Hawks Recoil In Fear After “This Time It’s Different” Warning

January 29, 2023

American War Hawks Recoil In Fear After “This Time It’s Different” Warning

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A compelling new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting socialist Western colonial leader German Chancellor Olaf Scholz stating this morning: “Over the past 11 months, I have spoken with Putin over and over again, as French President Emmanuel Macron does…The last call was at the beginning of December…And I will talk to Putin on the phone again because it is necessary to talk to each other…The tone of such conversations is not impolite, despite absolutely different views on an awful senseless war…I consider it important to always bring the conversation back to a particular topic on the way for the world to get out of this awful state…The conditions for that are clear – the pullout of Russian troops”, says in quick response, top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters: “There are no phone calls on the schedule so far…President Putin was and is open to contacts”, then he factually declared: “There is a hybrid war being waged against Russia, including economic warfare”.

In knowing that the socialist Western colonial powers “hybrid war” against Russia is nearing a nuclear apocalypse, this report notes, yesterday it saw President Donald Trump warning the American peoples: “Through weakness and incompetence, Joe Biden has brought us to the brink of World War III”—a warning joined by President Trump’s former national security advisor US Army General Michael Flynn grimly assessing: “We are going to creep into this war like we crept into other wars like Vietnam, like Afghanistan, like Iraq and this going to be turned into an absolute disaster… This is bad for America….This is bad for the world… We are about to enter potentially World War III”—a grim assessment that followed top NATO commander Royal Netherlands Navy Admiral Rob Bauer proclaiming: “NATO is ready is ready for a direct confrontation with Russia”—all of which caused Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev to gravely observe: “Firstly, defending Ukraine, which nobody needs in Europe, will not save the senile Old World from retribution if anything occurs…Secondly, once the Third World War breaks out, unfortunately it will not be on tanks or even on fighter jets…Then everything will definitely be turned to dust”.

After four days of military exercises stretching from the Mediterranean Sea up into space, this report continues, the United States and Israel fired more than 180,000 pounds of live munitions in the largest joint exercise ever carried out by these allies—within hours of this largest ever joint military exercise concluding yesterday, Iran came under a drone attack during the early hours of this morning—the Iranian Defense Ministry then reported: “Air defense units have repelled a drone attack on a military workshop in the central city of Isfahan…The unsuccessful attack did not cause any loss of life and only led to minor damage to the roof of a workshop”—after which Al-Arabiya television reported: “The US Air Force and “one more country” attacked the Iranian defense ministry’s military plant in the city of Isfahan using drones”.

Along with the socialist Western colonial powers attempting to provoke Iran into joining World War III, this report details, top American military commander General Mike Minihan, who leads the United States Air Force Air Mobility Commandominously warned his forces to prepare for total war against China and issued the order to all of his subordinate commanders: “This goes right down to demanding that various personnel visit the shooting range to make clear that unrepentant lethality matters most…Aim for the head”—is a war against the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) being built by China to break the socialist Western colonial stranglehold on free global trade—in the just published article “Amid The Smoke Of War, Power In Europe Is Shifting Decisively To The East” sees it revealing: “The only proposition Germans now accept is that Scholz lacks leadership qualities; the latest opinion polls indicate that only a quarter of voters consider him a strong leader. So, far from being transformative, Germany’s tank decision offers no reassurance that the future strategic choices of Europe’s most significant and wealthiest nation will be reached with the speed or the determination that will be increasingly necessary”—and is an important revelation to notice when viewed in the light of world-renowned Brazilian geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar, in his just published open letter “Can You Smell What The Year Of The Rabbit Is Cooking?”, assessing:

The exchanges between Europe and China may have started only in the 1st century B.C.  The men who actually traversed the Eurasian immensities were actually few.  It’s only in the year 98 that the Chinese ambassadorship of Gan Ying departs for Da Qin – that is, Rome.  He never arrived.

In the year 166, the Antoninus Pius ambassadorship, allegedly sent by the Emperor himself, finally hits China; but in fact that’s just an adventurous merchant.  For 13 centuries there was a huge exploratory void.

Despite the prodigious advances of Islam and the omnipresence of Muslim merchants since the 7th century, it’s only in the 13th century – at the time of the last Crusades and the Mongol conquest – that Europeans picked up again the road towards the East.  And then, on the 15th century, the Ming emperors succeeding the Mongols totally closed China to the outside world.

It’s only due to a certain extent to the Jesuits in the 16th century that a meeting finally happened – 17 centuries too late:  Europe finally started to acquire some knowledge of China, even as it dreamed about it over and over again, since chic Roman patricians were enveloped in transparent silk robes.

It’s only around 1600 that Europeans seem to have become aware that Northern China and Southern China are on the same continent.  So we may conclude that China really became known in the West only after the “discovery” of the Americas.

Two worlds ignored each other for so long – and still, all along the watchtowers in the middle of the steppes, trade kept moving from one side of Eurasia to another.

Now it’s time for another historical push – even as a discombobulated Europe is kept hostage by a cabal of imperial Straussian neo-cons and neoliberal-cons. Duisburg, in the Rhur valley, the world’s largest inland port, after all remains the key Iron Silk Road hub across BRI, linked by endless railways to Chongqing in China.

Wake up, Young German: your future is in the East.

With the socialist Western colonial powers using Ukraine as their lynchpin conflict to destroy the Belt and Road Initiative so they can maintain their stranglehold on global trade, while keeping Germany from turning East, as it’s rightfully a Eurasian nation more linked to Russia and China than the United States an ocean away, this report notes, one of those knowing the truth is former Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski, who just factually observed: “Ukrainian elites are simply wasting their time…They are hiding their corruption and delusions of grandeur behind a story that they are playing some big game with the United States, Russia, Europe, and China”—a factual observation joined by Politico reporting this morning: “A contingent of military officials is quietly pushing the Pentagon to approve sending F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine to help the country defend itself from Russian missile and drone attacks, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions”—and as to why this “contingent of military officials” in America wants to escalated the conflict in Ukraine, the just published article “Why We Fight: US Openly Salivates Over Ukraine’s Vast Untapped Titanium Reserves”, sees it reveals:

Ukraine could provide the United States and its allies with the titanium they need to build the fighter jets, warships, tanks, missiles, and other weapons required to confront Russia and China, sources on Capitol Hill with ties to the military-industrial complex have told US media.

Ukraine has really significant deposits of rare earth minerals, and if we play our cards right could actually be a really attractive alternative to Russian and Chinese sources, which is where a lot of dependency currently is”, one anonymous congressional staffer said.  “As there are increasing debates throughout the West about why it’s in our interest to keep supporting Ukraine, I think this is one of the arguments that you’re going to start hearing more”, the person said.

Titanium is also a “key vulnerability” for the US, a source with knowledge of the US defense sector said.  “We’re talking about our ability to produce more planes, we’re talking about our ability to produce munitions. They all rely on titanium, and we’ve allowed ourselves to grow reliant on foreign suppliers for these things. Russia has previously been one of those primary suppliers”, they added.

The US depends on imports for over 90 percent of its iron ore, and does not maintain titanium in its National Defense Stockpile.

Among those knowing how the United States and its socialist Western colonial allies plot needless wars to plunder global resources, this report continues, is former US Marine intellignece officer and UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter, who, in his just released open letter “How I Tried To Prevent The 2003 US Invasion Of Iraq, And Why I Failed”, grimly reveals: “No amount of truth can stop the world’s most powerful war machine fueled by the lies of its president”, but during an interview this past week he also factually observed: “NATO and their allies are extremely divided, and you know there are countries that are outright saying that they are not interfering in this…Other countries are only pretending to be involved by providing equipment that will not work. But most importantly, none of them believes that Ukraine can win the conflict, no one”.

Guiding the American war machine for over 100 years, this report details, is the United States socialist-globalist foreign policy think tank Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), that sends out its marching orders via the publication Foreign Affairs magazine, but which this past week published the article “The End Of The Age Of Sanctions?”, wherein it admitted the Western colonial sanctions on Russia “have failed”, and stated: “Sanctions have long been the United States’ favored diplomatic weapon…The Biden administration’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is a case in point: it immediately imposed a raft of punitive economic measures on Moscow and rallied other governments to do the same…That sanctions are a popular tool of U.S. policymakers makes sense…They fill the void between empty diplomatic declarations and deadly military interventions…Yet the golden days of U.S. sanctions may soon be over”—and was an admission of fact quickly followed by the article “Goodbye Empire? US Sanctions Are Failing In The Face Of Multipolarity”, wherein it observed: “Foreign Affairs, a highly influential US magazine – effectively a US empire house journal – has published an article detailing how sanctions are quickly losing their efficiency as a weapon in Washington’s global arsenal…This speed of this about-face could well be an indication of how irresistibly the multipolar world is coming to be”.

Guiding the American war machine for the past 74 years, this report notes, is the United States government funded Pentagon think tank RAND Corporation, that published volumes of documents and studies supporting failed wars in VietnamIraq and Afghanistan, to name just a few, but this past week published its study “Avoiding a Long War: U.S. Policy and the Trajectory of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict”, wherein it warns: “The costs and risks of a long war in Ukraine are significant and outweigh the possible benefits of such a trajectory for the United States…The consequences of a long war—ranging from persistent elevated escalation risks to economic damage—far outweigh the possible benefits…Since avoiding a long war is the highest priority after minimizing escalation risks, the United States should take steps that make an end to the conflict over the medium term more likely”—and was fear-drenched study quickly followed by the article “New RAND Study Breaks From US Hawks, Warns Against “Protracted Conflict” In Ukraine”, wherein it observed: “The famous Pentagon and US government-linked think tank RAND Corporation has finally attempted to inject some rare realism into the Washington establishment’s thinking and planning regarding the Ukraine war”.

Though barely known to the American people, this report concludes, both the Council on Foreign Relations and RAND Corporation think tanks pay strict close attention to the analysis provided by former top Pentagon advisor and decorated combat tactical legend retired US Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor Ph.D., who, just prior to these think tanks releasing their fearful findings last week, released his analytical document “This Time It’s Different”, wherein he assessed and warned:

Contrary to early Beltway hopes and expectations, Russia neither collapsed internally nor capitulated to the collective West’s demands for regime change in Moscow.

Washington underestimated Russia’s societal cohesion, its latent military potential, and its relative immunity to Western economic sanctions.  As a result, Washington’s proxy war against Russia is failing.

Ukraine’s materiel losses are equally severe.  These include thousands of tanks and armored infantry fighting vehicles, artillery systems, air defense platforms, and weapons of all calibers.  These totals include the equivalent of seven years of Javelin missile production.

In a setting where Russian artillery systems can fire nearly 60,000 rounds of all types—rockets, missiles, drones, and hard-shell ammunition—a day, Ukrainian forces are hard-pressed to answer these Russian salvos with 6,000 rounds daily.  New platform and ammunition packages for Ukraine may enrich the Washington community, but they cannot change these conditions.

So where is Washington headed with its proxy war against Russia?  The question deserves an answer.

Washington emotes.  Washington does not think, and it is also overtly hostile to empiricism and truth.  Neither we nor our allies are prepared to fight all-out war with Russia, regionally or globally.

The point is, if war breaks out between Russia and the United States, Americans should not be surprised.  The Biden administration and its bipartisan supporters in Washington are doing all they possibly can to make it happen.

[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

January 29, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

Continue Reading

Repost by Permission: World War III Alert Issued By Trump Joins WHO Nuclear Emergency Bulletin

January 28, 2023

World War III Alert Issued By Trump Joins WHO Nuclear Emergency Bulletin

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An extremely worrisome new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting President Donald Trump posted the World War III alert message: “FIRST COME THE TANKS, THEN COME THE NUKES…Get this crazy war ended, NOW…So easy to do!”, says President Trump then posted the message: “IF I WERE PRESIDENT, THE RUSSIA/UKRAINE WAR WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED, BUT EVEN NOW, IF PRESIDENT, I WOULD BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN END TO THIS HORRIBLE AND RAPIDLY ESCALATING WAR WITHIN 24 HOURS…SUCH A TRAGIC WASTE OF HUMAN LIFE!!!”, and in quick response, top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated: “Trump is theoretically not far away from the truth…Indeed, should Biden wish to put an end to this conflict, he could do it very quickly, using the opportunity to simply give instructions to the Kiev regime…Such a result is impossible to achieve overnight or in a couple of days, but in many respects the key to the Kiev regime resides in Washington’s hands”.

In response to the socialist Western colonial powers announcing they are sending tanks to Ukraine, this report notes, Deputy Envoy Maksim Buyakevich to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe warned: “The leaders of the United States and their NATO client states have come close to a red line…This is a straight path into a full-blown conflict in Europe, which absolutely all people living on our continent definitely stand to lose from…And the puppet masters of the ongoing escalation, the United States and United Kingdom, would hardly be able to sit it out either”—a warning now joined by Deputy Foreign Minister Oleg Syromolotov revealing: “The British are systematically using their offensive capabilities to target Russia’s information sector…London regularly conducts exercises, including joint NATO drills, simulating attacks on Russian critical infrastructure…They include the modeling of strikes on government entities in the Kaliningrad Region and Moscow’s energy system”.

Shortly after President Trump posted his World War III alert message and Deputy Envoy Buyakevich issued his warning, this report continues, Secretary General Stefano Sannino of the European Union’s European External Action Service declared: “Russia is now at war against NATO and the West”—a declaration swiftly joined by the World Health Organization (WHO) issuing the urgent bulletin “WHO Updates Critical Medicines List For Radiological And Nuclear Emergencies”, wherein it warns: “In radiation emergencies, people may be exposed to radiation at doses ranging from negligible to life-threatening…Governments need to make treatments available for those in need – fast”—and was an urgent bulletin swiftly followed by articles appearing like “World Health Organization (WHO) Has Issued Guidance On How To Survive A Nuclear Catastrophe, Just Hours After The EU Warned That Russia “Is At War With The West””.

In response to the socialist Western colonial powers announcing their tank escalation of the present conflict fast leading to World War III, this report notes, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky warned: “If the American tanks arrive as late as August, it will be too late…A handful of tanks won’t make a difference on the battlefield”, then he grimly assessed: “The occupiers are not just storming our positions, they are deliberately and methodically destroying the towns and villages around them, with artillery, air strikes, missiles…The Russian army has no shortage of lethal means and can only be stopped by force”—and was a grim assessment joined by Chinese global information giant NetEase reporting: “As of 18 January, total Ukrainian soldier casualties have exceeded 500,000 and may even reach 680,000, far exceeding the general estimate”.

Early today, this report notes, the Ministry of Defense (MoD) reported massive losses of Ukrainian soldiers and equipment of the past 24 hours, and revealed: “In all, the Russian Armed Forces have destroyed 380 Ukrainian combat aircraft, 204 helicopters, 2,967 unmanned aerial vehicles, 402 surface-to-air missile systems, 7,644 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 991 multiple rocket launchers, 3,932 field artillery guns and mortars and 8,191 special military motor vehicles since the beginning of the special military operation”—and in the just published Western defense article “Unthinkable Defeat Of The Ukrainians Brings A New Domino Collapse: The Russians With A Lightning Attack Take Ugledar – The Fortress Town Has Fallen!”, sees it observing: “The Russian Army with a lightning general attack managed to enter the Ukrainian fortress city of Ugledar (or Volendar) from two axes and sweep the Ukrainian defenses…The Ukrainians have effectively lost the city…It is clear that the Ukrainian forces are collapsing at the speed of light on all the fronts of Donbass”.

As his socialist Western colonial powers supplied military forces near total defeat on the battlefield, this report notes, President Zelensky has begun a mass purge of government officials and signed a decree forbidding any Ukrainian official leaving the country—and in a shocking revelation, His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia just reported that Ukrainian snipers are targeting Christian priests first, then he beyond shockingly revealed: “The architects of international conflicts hate the Ukrainian Orthodox Church because it could serve as an instrument of reconciliation between the Russian and Ukrainian people…That is why there are demands that it be persecuted”.

With articles now appearing like “How To Kill An Abrams! Russian ‘Experts’ Issue A Guidebook On Where & How To Destroy The US Main Battle Tank”, this report continues, Russian military expert and analyst Alexey Leonkov observed: “Neither the German-made Leopard 2 nor the US M1 Abrams tanks are invincible…The Leopards’ first combat experience, and battlefield losses, occurred during the US-led war in Afghanistan…In the course of fighting against the Taliban, three Canadian and six Danish Leopard 2s were irretrievably lost, with another 15 Canadian Leopards disabled…US tank battalions sustained losses in urban combat during Washington’s invasion of Iraq…Over 80 Abrams were destroyed and 530 more had been forced back to the US for extensive repairs”—and in the just published military article “Truth About Tanks: How NATO Lied Its Way To Disaster In Ukraine”, sees it factually revealing:

The truth about tanks is that NATO and its allied nations are making Ukraine weaker, not stronger, by providing them with military systems that are overly complicated to operate, extraordinarily difficult to maintain, and impossible to survive unless employed in a cogent manner while supported by extensive combined arms partners.

The decision to provide Ukraine with Western main battle tanks is, literally, a suicide pact.

Tanks are among the most technically challenging weapons systems on a modern battlefield.  They are constantly breaking down, especially if not properly maintained.  For the M1 Abrams, for every hour a tank is in the field, there are three hours of maintenance time required.  This problem only becomes magnified in combat.

Tank warfare also has evolved.  The large force-on-force armored battles that were the hallmark of much of World War II, the Arab-Israeli conflicts, which served as the foundation of operational doctrine for both NATO and the Soviet Union (and which was implemented in full by the United States during Operation Desert Storm in 1991), has run its course.

Like most military technological innovations, the ability to make a modern main battle tank survivable has been outstripped by the fielding of defensive systems designed to overcome such defenses.

If a modern military force attempted to launch a large-scale tank-dominated attack against a well-equipped peer-level opponent armed with modern anti-tank missiles, the result would be a decisive defeat for the attacking party marked by the smoking hulks of burned-out tanks.

As to why the socialist Western colonial powers are really sending tanks to Ukraine that they know will be quickly obliterated, this concludes, was just explained by top Kremlin media analyst Elena Karaeva, who, in her just released open letter “The West Has Never Given Up Plans To Destroy Russia”, most factually observes: “The transfer of tanks as part of assistance to Ukraine, their careful calculation by the entire planetary media community, the assessment of the combat capability of the Abrams and Leopards, and the analysis of their performance characteristics are in fact just a smokescreen to prevent global public opinion from seeing the main thing…And most importantly, this is not at all an increase in the degree of escalation, this is the beginning of a war…Them with us”—and is factual observation concurred with by famed American economist James Rickards, who, in his just released open letter “World War III: Has It Begun?”, warns:

Has World War III already begun?

That’s a serious question and deserves serious consideration by investors.  A wave of analysts and commentators have warned that the war in Ukraine could spin out of control and escalate into World War III.

One variation on that theme is that the war could escalate into a nuclear war with tactical nuclear weapons deployed.  Most point a finger at Russia as the party that will launch a nuclear strike out of desperation at a failing campaign in Ukraine.

Actually, the opposite is true.

The Russian campaign is not failing (it has been on hold for several months awaiting the right conditions to launch a winter offensive).  You just don’t hear about it in the mainstream media, which is essentially a propaganda outlet for Ukraine.

And the party most likely to use nuclear weapons first is the U.S. in order to save face and destabilize Russia once Ukraine is on the brink of collapse.

Many people have a hard time believing that.  They’ve been told that Putin is the devil incarnate and would probably like to destroy the world.

We like to think that in modern times we’re sophisticated and above falling prey to propaganda.  Unfortunately, it isn’t true.

The fact is the U.S. did wage the only nuclear war in history from Aug. 6–9, 1945 and had a successful outcome.  I’m not getting into the morality of it here, one way or the other.  I’m just being objective.

Either way, another nuclear war could not be contained and it would be tantamount to World War III.  It amounts to the same thing.

But my point is different.  It’s not that we may be headed to World War III; it’s that we’re already there..

[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

January 28, 2023 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

Continue Reading

On-the-Job Discrimination




Continue Reading

Repost: Exclusive: Owen Shroyer- Kari Lake Interview

Original Post

Continue Reading
Romans 10:9 that if you will confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart, one believes resulting in righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made resulting in salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes in him will not be disappointed.” 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, and is rich to all who call on him. 13 For, “Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved.”