Architects and Engineers for 911 truth have come out with a documentary and a booklet for 911 truth. You can get the booklet (50 pages of facts) at their site.
The narrative on the hospital bombing is changing. The story is changing and morphing like a chameleon to protect the guilty.
What is taqiyya?
The short definition is that a Muslim can lie when necessary.
Is this a matter of taqiyya?
Obama has repeatedly referred to his Muslim background (4 videos here).
It is good again to review the meaning of taqiyya (different link with more insight).
So, should we believe the 10 year old? Or is this a diversionary tactic? Is this taqiyya?
We are beginning to see the ultimate end of the deceptive two step dance the West has been led to dance.
For a while the dance was popular. The first dance move was to loosen historic norms, legally and morally. People demanded more of what they wanted. New “norms” contrary to historical ethics and laws became commonplace. With it came a corresponding increase in corruption in high places. This was phase one.
Some people thought the party was just beginning. However, what people did not count on, was that phase two was coming. They were duped into thinking this was all about “them”, their pleasures, their rights, their wants, and their desires. It wasn’t about them. They were pawns in a larger power play.
While the people thought they were getting moral relativistic “freedom” to follow any desire of their heart, in order to have that, they had to vote in rulers like themselves…who were willing to forgo historical norms of morality and law that had been built over the centuries, much of it on a religious foundation based on the laws and freedoms given to man by God.
One of the founding fathers rightly said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” John Adams
Morality and freedom are twins that cannot be separated. While some would like to say that society can be free and immoral, it cannot be. Because if immorality is the norm of all, that threatens freedom. An immoral society may allow such norms as theft and murder. If a nation’s leadership allows theft and murder, that leader is called a dictator. A dictator steals freedom and murders those who oppose him.
In the attempt to cover up what is happening, a society may try to redefine terms such as moral and immoral. It may try to teach different norms in the schools. It departs from historical meanings of words. It legislates differently than it has done for centuries. Regardless of how it tries to cover its actions, none of that fundamentally changes what is happening. A nation cannot become immoral and get away from historic laws built up over the centuries without losing freedom for all.
This is the pivotal point of the change into step two of the deceptive two step dance that the masses are generally unaware of until it is too late.
As the moorings of society are loosened from morality, there is greater accommodation for the power hungry, greedy and ruthless to have greater sway in society. There are more murders. There are more violations of human rights. And governments, rather than stopping this, aid, abet, foment it, and legislate it into existence. Why? Because they are like it, just at the larger level of world domination.
The ultimate objective is to bring into subjection all who will not bow to the dictatorship of a ruling elite which wants all power and wealth.
In step one of the two step dance, the average person felt that he was on the way to more for himself. He felt and was being told that he was being loosed from restrictive laws and norms. It was a ruse. He was being setup to be a pawn in a greater worldwide power play that would ultimately take his freedom.
Step one happened with his cooperation. Step two needs less of his cooperation because forces at the top are pushing their agenda. The only thing that can stop step two is for society to wake up and realize how they have been used as pawns and reverse direction.
Harry Reid is suing the company that made the machine that supposedly contributed to his eye injury.
However, other stories have it that his brother beat him up.
I guess the question might be, if it were really the machine, why is he suing now after all this time?
Decide for yourself.