How many times have you heard it said, “We are a nation of laws”? We are not. We were a nation of laws, but that cannot really be said about the United States any more.
Take the current election. We have three candidates who should not be running. Since one is a Democrat, I won’t talk about that one, since it should be obvious who it is. I am more concerned about the Republican candidates that are running on lies and hypocrisy. How so?
Both Cruz and Rubio do not meet the natural born citizen requirement. If they are allowed to stay in the race, not only does it dilute the results of the legitimate candidates, but also at the end it allows for a “bait and switch”. The “chump” Republican party, which doesn’t worry a whole lot about the law, but about the “good old boys’ club”, will get to the end of the primaries and if necessary for the power elite, for the Davos group, for the cabal, for the illuminati, for NWO people, however you want to name them, if necessary at that time all of a sudden the eligibility issue will come up and then….ooppps….we made a mistake. Not eligible. Let’s put Bush in. Just like Democrats plan on doing with Biden (read the transcript here from a former Clinton insider).
The Democratec Party Convention rules allow for the bait and switch. Do the Republican rules? Does it really matter whether they currently do or not anyway? Does anyone care about historic law, or do they just rewrite it as they go along? Remember, they want progressive law. Progressive law evolves it the way you need it to evolve to get the will of the elite done.
Why is it that three governors, with extremely low ratings compared to some of the others, rush to New Hampshire after Iowa? Do they know that someday Rubio and Cruz may be called on their eligibility issue? I don’t know that the elite is that concerned about Rubio, he might serve their purposes nicely. But they don’t want Cruz. In any case, even though no one is really talking about the eligibility issue now, you can bet that if necessary to accomplish certain goals, someone, whether Democrat or Republican, will bring it up.
The Democrats will bring it up to knock out the Republican candidate. The Republicans will bring it up if the Republican picked is not the one the New World Order wants. Of course, all this can be avoided if Cruz and Rubio are removed now. And, it can all be avoided if Donald Trump is picked. The NWO, the elite, the Davos people, the cabal, the Illuminati, whatever name you want to call those who pull the strings behind the scene and in reality have controlled the United States behind the scenes for generations, do not want Trump. That is why they are fighting him so. That is why they are running ads for Rubio. Trump will not be controlled. Trump is his own man, funding his own campaign, intending to make America great again.
The Davos people, the NWO people, the elite, the cabal, the Illuminati, by whatever name you want to call them, the Bilderberg group, etc., they do not want America strong or great again. A poor, enslaved people overrun with illegal immigration, suits them just fine as they move to one world controlled by themselves and where the money and power flows to them. It takes ignorance, poverty, and weakness to allow that to happen. Trump will reverse that trend and that scares them. That terrifies them. They will lose the end game with Trump.
And so to achieve that end it is necessary to break the law. You need a bunch of candidates in. You need two who are not eligible and who should not be running.
Which takes us back to the premise of this article. We are not a nation of laws. They are bent and broken by the very people who have sworn allegiance to them. So we have two illegal candidates running and it is covered up with a veneer of Christianity. There is an appeal to Christians in the name of God, and Christians who have been too busy looking for the rapture and who are not really up-to-date on their Constitution or the workings of the Davos, elite, cabal, NWO, Illuminati, Bilderberg people are deceived.
No wonder Jesus said from the cross, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”
The very people Jesus came to help crucified him. The people were seeking to worship God in the temple, but crucified Him on the cross. And so the law and the Constitution is crucified in the name of God in this election. It is lies and hypocrisy in the name of Jesus.
The Republicans are chumps. They do not see how they are being used. All the Republicans rallying around either Cruz or Rubio are being used to break the law. And in the end, if necessary, the Democrats will rise up with the eligibility issue.
The Republicans were too lackadaisical with Obama’s birth certificate issue. So many said it did not matter. So how is that working out for you? This is another issue of eligibility being swept under the carpet, but remember, if necessary the dirt will be brought out and used at the right moment strategically to put in whatever Republican candidate the Davos people want.
Don’t be so ignorant and allow yourself to be so used by the group that is smarter strategically than you are. Don’t support an illegal candidate, illegal by the original meaning of the Constitution. Don’t do it or the Republicans will again find themselves the losers because they did not plan on anyone actually using the law. Republicans are not smart or swift enough to use the law when necessary, but the Democrats will.
In this article, and occasionally other articles, you see the comments that the “followers of Trump” do not have college degrees. I just want to make a comment about those with college degrees.
Can we assume that those in high political office and the media have college degrees? Can we assume they each probably not only have one, but many perhaps multiple degrees?
If that is so, and that assumption is probably correct, does a college degree mean anything at this point? Or what is a degree about? Is a degree about how to look the other way when corruption is happening? Is a degree about how to say a lot of words and say nothing? Is a degree about how corrupt you can be and get away with it? Is it about knowing what you can say without legally get into trouble? Is a degree about how to let a trojan horse takeover of the nation occur while you keep your fingers in the cookie jar and keep taking part of the pie for yourself while you stay out of prison? Is a degree about how to back up each other in corruption? Just exactly what are those with college degrees doing with them?
We see the sheer stupidity of what the politicians are doing. The media (again, those with college degrees), ignore a lot of what is going on, or they are muzzled. To find the truth you need to go to the alternative media on the internet like the DrudgeReport or Infowars.
These politicians with college degrees are inviting a military invasion into Europe, and also here, through open borders that permit in terrorists. Jobs are sent overseas. Citizens are on welfare. Politicians can’t balance the budget. We drop weapons to the enemy in the Middle East. We have multiple liars in political office. We have a presidential candidate embroiled in scandals and who keeps evading prison. Guaranteed: if it were anyone else who had done the private server thing, she would have been hauled to prison long ago. We have an extremely stupid agreement with Iran. We pour money into education but it does not produce an educated populace. Then again, dumb graduates are what a corrupt political system needs because it can control a poor and dumb population. Then also, so-called “leaders” manipulate the economy and bring booms and crashes. There are so many more things wrong with the system and remember, this system was created by those with the college degrees. So was it a college degree to solve problems or a college degree on how to be corrupt and gain money and power?
We need to ask why those with college degrees are so incapable of doing anything smart.
Maybe at this point, it is the people who have not been corrupted and brainwashed by colleges to act stupidly who really have more intelligence.
Why? He threatens their control of the world. Trump threatens their control of corrupted systems: political, economic, corporate, media and more. Trump is the only one who threatens them. Most of the other candidates would serve their purposes.
This is a partial transcription of the Senator’s speech, enough to get the gist of it. If you want to hear the full speech, you can listen below. The transcription starts about 00:33
Resolution that the majority leader introduced, I believe
authorization for military force resolution that apparently
purports to give the President legal authority
to conduct military operations against ISIS
to come to the floor
to explain why very briefly to my colleagues
to explain what this resolution really is
this resolution is a total rewrite of the war powers clause
of the United States constitution, let’s be clear about that
It is essentially a declaration of international martial law
a sweeping transfer of military power to the president that will
allow him or her to send us troops almost anywhere
in the world for almost any reason
with absolutely no limitations
Now Article I Section 8 of the Constitution
invests in Congress the responsibility to declare war
many of us on both sides of the aisle
have been arguing for over a year that the
exceeded his constitutional authority in continuing
without specific authorization from Congress
Now I have been amongst those calling on those to debate
an authorization of military force
about the right way to authorize war against our sworn enemy ISIS
a terrorist organization that deserves to be degraded
and defeated, wiped off the map of this earth
while the ink is still wet on this resolution
it is safe to say that this resolution is the wrong way
to authorize war against ISIS
The language of this resolution is dangerous and it is unprecedented
The American people want Congress to authorize war against ISIS
but they also want to make sure we don’t send 100’s of thousands
of US soldiers back into the Middle East
certainly don’t want Congress to hand over the power to
the President send our troops into any country
anywhere in the world
for almost any reason
that’s what this resolution would do
doesn’t give the power to President to deploy US troops
in Iraq and Syria
it gives the power to the President
without consulting Congress
to deploy US forces in any one of the 60+ countries
in any one of the
where ISIS has a single sympathizer
and even worse, the language
doesn’t even require ISIS
to be present in a country
all that is required
is that the threat of ISIS was present
the threat of ISIS is present in virtually any corner of the world
thus this resolution would give the President
total, absolute, carte blanche
to send our young soldiers to any corner of the world
without consulting Congress
It would permanently had over war-making power to the President and Congress would never get it back….