Federal Employees Seek To Dodge Obamacare
In a major case of hypocrisy, federal employees and lawmakers seek to dodge the requirement of being insured by Obamacare personally. They would rather keep their own private insurance. Click here to read more.
From the Merriam-Webster Dictionary (click here):
Definition of HYPOCRISY
1: a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not; especially : the false assumption of an appearance of virtue or religionExamples of HYPOCRISY
the hypocrisy of people who say one thing but do another
Reputation Valued More Than The Truth
When asked by Lord Monckton why he would not deal with the Obama birth certificate issue, one politician replied this way:
“It is unquestionably a forgery…I value my reputation, and I dare not take the risk of having it destroyed.”
What Can Be Done?
What can be done about all the corruption and scandals in Washington, D.C.? What will be done? Will anything be done about them?
It used to be that people who talked about corruption in Washington, D.C., were considered a “fringe” internet element that was ridiculed.
Now the evidence of the corruption has gone mainstream and is talked about in the nightly news, as well as in major publications and websites.
The question is, “What can be done?”
The fact there is corruption in Washington D.C. is evident to all, at least to those who are even half-way paying attention. The question is, will anything be done about it?
When I hear professionals speak in the news, no matter what their background or degree may be, my question to them is, “What can be done?”
If all the professional lawmakers, judges, and federal employees can do is say that we have a problem, or discuss the facts of the lies and crimes, well, the most observing average citizens among us can see and say those things as well.
What we look to the professionals for, to the judges, to those who know law, to the Constitutional experts, perhaps even to the military is this: What can be done? Do any of them have answers?
For if all that people can say, whether professional or amateur, whether degreed or non-degreed, whether expert or non-expert, is that we have a problem, and those with the degrees, experience, and expertise cannot say any more than anyone else says, if those with the degrees, knowledge, and expertise about law have no solutions, then we have a problem.
Why does someone go to a doctor when they are sick? They assume that the doctor, with his knowledge, experience, and verified degrees has a greater ability to restore someone to health than someone without the knowledge, experience, and degrees.
In the case of the many scandals going on in Washington D.C., if the politicians, lawyers, attorneys, judges, Constitutional experts, and military cannot figure out what to do, then we have a real problem.
Then basically, we have a situation and a country, where criminals can gravitate to the highest offices in the land, commit egregious crimes, and nothing happens.
Why wouldn’t a criminal want to be a politician if that were the case? Washington D.C. becomes a zone where there are no repercussions for lies, deceit and crimes. What criminal wouldn’t look on that as fertile territory to carry out crimes? If nothing happens, then white collar criminals will gravitate to the highest offices in the land.
So, do we have any experts among us that can do something about all the scandals going on in Washington D.C.?
Or, are we just going to have hearings, hearings, and more hearings; questions, questions, and more questions; committees, committees, and more committees, and then in the end, nothing happens? Does everyone go home at the end of the day and lies, crimes, and deceit go on as usual?
If not, then basically the greatness of the United States has ended and it has just become another banana Republic dictatorship.
Is Congress incapable of doing anything? Has the rule of law ended in the United States? Anyone?
Did James Clapper Lie?
Here is the original question to which he answered, “No.”
.
In retrospect, when asked about his response, he replied: (Source: Click here)
“I thought, though in retrospect, I was asked [a] ‘when are you going to … stop beating your wife’ kind of question, which is … not answerable necessarily by a simple yes or no. So I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful, manner by saying, ‘No.’ ”
The question becomes not so much, did James Clapper lie, as to what the country is going to do about it?
This is a good place for a modified-to-fit-the-occasion, Texas joke.
A Texan was asked by someone on a Senate investigative committee why Texans speak so slowly. He replied, “So y’all have time to understand the answer.”
So let’s take this real slowly.
Perjury. P…e…r…j…u…r…y
Here is the dictionary definition, and you can read more by clicking here.
A crime that occurs when an individual willfully makes a false statement during a judicial proceeding, after he or she has taken an oath to speak the truth.
Better Get Going While The Going Is Good
Congress better get going while the going is good. If Congress is going to put anyone(s) in the slammer, they better pick up the pace a little. As those of us outside D.C. watch, we see an impotent Congress, in that no matter how much material is uncovered as to wrong doings, nothing happens. My goodness, if this had been the average employee of any business in the United States (and government officials are actually supposed to be employees of the American people), then these people would have been fired from their jobs and/or put in prison a long time ago.
Can you imagine your average employee in any business pilfering through personal records in the office of a business, and the business just lets it happen? Do you think that same employee would still hold a job? There is a reason that those filing cabinets are locked up. It is supposed to be private material, only available to a personnel manager who is qualified to view it. Yet we have wholesale abductions of phone records and the attitude on the part of the government is “business as usual”.
Let’s cut to the chase, because these points could be expanded, but it is not necessary. Anyone who is thinking can figure it out. The main point is this, which must be understood.
If Congress is not capable of taking legal action against government officials that operate in a criminal capacity, then we have a real problem. If nothing can be done, then all these hearings are simply “smoke and mirrors” and “dog and pony” shows. The fact is, if Congress cannot do anything, then we really have lost the country, we really no longer have a Republic, what we have is a quasi-dictatorship that has Congressional hearings for show, for the purpose of pretense that there is some kind of rule of law in the United States, when actually the rule of law has ended. at least for government officials, bankers, and the Federal Reserve. If Holder, Clinton, Rice, any officials in the Obama administration, including Obama himself, are found guilty of breaking any laws or their Oaths of Office, and nothing happens, then we have lost the Republic. Congress is just a lame duck Congress. It is just operating for show. Basically, Obama is putting though his agenda as a dictator and all his men just go along.
We have to look at the reality of what is happening. If nothing is happening, in spite of all that has gone on, there are only two conclusions.
- Congress is powerless to do anything. It simply does not have what it takes to accomplish anything of significance so all they can do is hold hearings, hearings, and more hearings, but nothing will come of it.
- Congress, at least the conservatives and Republicans in Congress are thinking of doing something, but as they consider the possibilities of what they could do, there are so many skeletons rattling in their closets that they are afraid of getting out there because the next thing that happens is that the liberals and Democrats (and the liberal media) will start saying , “and what about your ‘skeleton of whatever’”. Then there will be a political blood bath and voters will get disgusted with the Republicans and kick them out at the next election. I’m sure that there are “private” meetings going on where Congressmen are being reminded of the “goods” that the opposing side has on them, and that these kinds of threats and blackmail are holding up legal action from being taken.
Just a thought here…when Nixon was impeached, I am wondering if that kind of behind-the-scenes activity took place. If it did, it apparently was not in large enough amounts to prevent the impeachment. As for Obama, while I know that there are thoughts of, and cries for impeachment, I personally feel it is FAR MORE EFFECTIVE to go after Obama on the fraudulent birth certificate issue. If you deal with the birth certificate, and prove that he is not legally President, then EVERYTHING he has signed, such as the behemoth Obamacare, also Executive Orders, vetoes, UN treaties, appointments, etc., become null and void. Impeachment alone leaves a trail of destruction to deal with. Dealing legally with Obama on the basis of a fraudulent birth certificate and him not meeting the Constitutional requirements to be President deals with the core issue that will remove all the carnage, or a lot of it, of what his administration has done. Of course, the debt will remain to be dealt with, but Obamacare and other things will go away. Dealing with Obama legally on the basis of his birth certificate will get a lot more done to reverse what he has done than to simply impeach him.
Back to the beginning of this post…Congress better get going while the going is good. If Congress continues to act in an impotent manner, pretty soon it will be obvious to everyone that “gig’s up”. Right now, the less involved and less contemplative portion of the population of the American people will see news bites and think that something may actually be happening. It is only those “news junkies” who watch these things day after day and in some cases, hour after hour, who are aware of how impotent Congress is. Once the need for deceiving the less involved portion of Americans is over, there will be no need for the “dog and pony” shows.
If things keep going as they are with an impotent Congress, the next time there is some egregious display of the wrong use of power by the administration, and Congress demands a hearing, they will be ignored. We are on the path to a complete dictatorship, if we are not already there. If Congress cannot do anything in the face of everything that has happened, then it has become irrelevant and it is only a matter of time until that becomes evident to the majority of the people. Right now the “dog and pony” shows of hearings make it seem like something is happening. But in reality, is anything being done? Let’s be honest. Are there any legal results or legal consequences in light of everything that has happened: Fast and Furious, Benghazi, AP records, the IRS scandal, Verizon records, other phone records, and of course, the birth certificate, which for many people, dropped off the list a long time ago, but that is really the “biggest” fish to fry in all this? The birth certificate issue is the kingpin for many other issues, if people can get honest and look at that.
I hope that Congress gets going. I hope it does more than just hold hearings. I would love to be able to write someday and say my harsh evaluation of Congress was a mistake. I would love to say that there actually were some people with guts who have gone in there and removed this rogue President and administration. I would love one day to say I was wrong, that the leadership actually did exist in Congress to get the job done.
Congress, get going while the going is good. Please prove me wrong in my considering you to be impotent to do anything.
This is the Problem
Beyond the blantant invasion of the United States government on peoples’ privacy, there is another problem with all the phone data mining activities. That is this.
Quoting the Washington Times:
But a White House official said such domestic surveillance is a “critical tool in protecting the nation from terror threats.”
“It allows counterterrorism personnel to discover whether known or suspected terrorists have been in contact with other persons who may be engaged in terrorist activities, particularly people located inside the United States,” said White House deputy press secretary Joshua Earnest.
The problem comes down to the definition of “suspected terrorists”. Now, up until now, Obama et.al., have been given a pretty big pass by all the press. Even with such egregious events as Fast and Furious, Benhazi, the AP incident, and dead Navy SEALS, no one has really gone back (outside Internet news centers such as Inforwars or WorldNetDaily, the USJF, Alan Keyes, Attorney Orley Taitz and some others) and revisited the history of who Barack Hussein Obama really is and where he came from (we’re talking a fraudulent, felony-material, birth certificate here, a Muslim school in childhood, Communist relatives, connections to Bill Ayers, and Saul Alinsky teachings).
If it ever registers with reporters, the media, and Congress, and the American people at large, that Obama was actually NOT born in Hawaii, that he actually does NOT meet the requirements according to the Constitution to be in the White House, that he WAS (is) a Muslim, then the light bulbs will go on that when he talks about “suspected terrorists”, he is not referring to Al-Qaeda. He is more likely referring to American Patriots, veterans, gun owners, Christians, home schoolers, and the likes of people who have old-fashioned values based on the love of God, the Constitution, and country.
As we watch Obama and his administration operate, none of it makes sense if he is truly a “red-blooded American”. But everything makes sense if he is a Muslim operating taqiyya, which is a doctrine where Muslims are permitted to lie to the enemy (in this case, the American people). It is why even the media catch him in lies. Taqiyya.
So the next time one of Obama’s staff talks about “suspected terrorists”, maybe one of the reporters should ask what the definition of a “suspected terrorist” is. Is it a grandma who bakes chocolate chip cookies for her grandkids before getting on a plane, and then they all are man-handled by the TSA as suspects?
The problem is, that with taqiyya, you never know if you are getting the real truth.
Read about taqiyya, lying to, and deceiving the enemy here.
After reading about taqiyya, read about Saul Alinsky’s,”Twelve Rules for Radicals” here.
Then consider everything you have read in terms of Obama’s administration.
Again, we cannot fully understand what is going on in Washington D.C., without taking the blinders off, actually looking at Obama’s history, and history in general, and considering everything in the context of the larger picture.
Who Is Running Washington, D.C.?
Who is running Washington, D.C.? Who is in charge? Who has the power? Who is really making the decisions?
Do You Believe The Things They Told You?
In view of all the investigations going on in Washington, D.C., in light of Benghazi, the IRS scandal, the AP incident, Fast and Furious, the fraudulent birth certificate and more, as the song lyrics go…”Do you believe the things they told you?”





