August 29, 2024
Trump Reveals On Brink Of World War III “God Wants Me To Save The World”
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A thought-provoking new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declared: “Ukraine’s incursion into Russia’s Kursk Region has escalated tensions to the limit, and former President Donald Trump is correct to warn that the situation could spiral into World War III”, says this declaration admitting that the Ukraine Nazi Regime terrorist invasion of the Kursk Region in Russia on 6 August now places the world on the brink of World War III, was joined by President Trump revealing about his miraculous saving from an assassins bullet: “The only thing I can think is that God loves our country and he thinks we’re gonna bring our country back…It has to be God…I mean how can you say it’s luck when it’s, you know, twenty million to one?…There’s some incredible power up there that wanted me to be involved in saving, and maybe it’s more than saving the nation, maybe it’s saving the world”.
During a United States Congress hearing yesterday, this report notes, CIA Deputy Director David Cohen declined to answer a direct question about whether he and his colleagues at Langley knew about Ukraine’s incursion into the Kursk Region, with him noting that the significance and implications of the attack “remain to be seen”—what can be seen about this terrorist invasion, however, Foreign Ministry official Rodion Miroshnik revealed: “We have evidence of sexual violence committed by both foreign mercenaries and Ukrainian radicals…We have data that Ukrainian militants are taking action to kidnap people…They are snatching civilians and taking them away to an unknown location…We often lose contact with them…Where are they taken?…To Ukrainian territory, or to secret prisons?…The Ukrainian leadership deployed all of its scum to Kursk Region in an apparent effort to get them out of the country and dispose of them”—and the Ministry of Defense (MoD) announced today: “The Ukrainian armed forces have lost up to 380 military personnel and 30 armored vehicles in the Kursk direction over the past day…In total, Kiev has lost up to 7,000 personnel since fighting started in the region since 6 August”.
Following Ukraine Commander-In-Chief Colonel General Aleksandr Syrsky admitting: “One of the tasks of conducting an offensive operation in the Kursk direction was to divert significant enemy forces from other directions, first and foremost the Pokrovsk and Kurakhovsk directions…Moscow didn’t take the bait”, this report continues, unelected usurper Ukraine Dictator Vladimir Zelensky grimly observed: “Pokrovsk and other areas in the Donetsk region are extremely difficult: the key Russian efforts and the largest forces are concentrated there”—in these directions the Ministry of Defense announced today that Russian military forces eliminated 1,955 Ukrainian servicemen during the past 24 hours along all frontlines—and the Kiev Post reported: “In the early hours of Thursday, 29 August, Russian forces launched a large-scale missile and drone attack on Ukraine, targeting multiple regions”.
In response to Ukrainians rebelling against being grabbed from their streets and homes for more cannon fodder, this report details, the Ukraine Nazi Regime just posted the dire threat: “All personnel of all draft offices have been notified that in the event of a threat to life, lethal force should be used…The jokes are over…You wanted it to go by law?…Everything will be according to the law”—a dire threat joined by the economic article “Game Over? Ukraine Announces Partial Halt To Payments On Its Gargantuan Debt”, wherein it revealed: “Ukraine’s Cabinet of Ministers issued a resolution ordering a partial halt to the servicing of its obligations on Eurobonds, sovereign GDP warrants and other loan instruments, driving the country one step closer to formal financial ruin”—all of which was joined by the obviously preparing to flee leadership of the Ukraine Nazi Regime demanding its Western backers immediately give them $50 billion with no strings attached, that clearly shows they are heeding the late senior American statesman Henry Kissinger most factually warning: “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal”.
Chief among those keeping the truth about Ukraine hidden from the American peoples, this report concludes, is David Sanger, the White House and National Security Correspondent for the leftist New York Times, and about whom the British newspaper of record Financial Times, in its just released article “Ukraine Has Crossed Moscow’s And Washington’s Red Lines”, shockingly revealed: “Zelenskyy is prepared to ignore Russia’s nuclear threats…But the Biden administration is still wary of escalating the war…According to a recent book by David Sanger, Biden even suggested to his aides that Zelenskyy might be deliberately trying to draw America into a third world war…As a result, there is a different appetite for risk in Washington and Kyiv”—and is a shocking revelation about President Biden’s fears of World War III joined by world-renowned British senior statesman Alastair Crooke, who, in his just released open letter “The Western Way Of War – Owning The Narrative Trumps Reality”, warningly observed:
War propaganda and feint are as old as the hills. Nothing new.
But what is new is that infowar is no longer the adjunct to wider war objectives – but has become an end in and of itself.
The West has come to view ‘owning’ the winning narrative – and presenting the Other’s as clunky, dissonant, and extremist – as being more important than facing facts-on-the ground. Owning the winning narrative is to win, in this view. Virtual ‘victory’ thus trumps ‘real’ reality.
So, war becomes rather the setting for imposing ideological alignment across a wide global alliance and enforcing it via compliant media.
The cumulative effect of ‘a winning virtual narrative’ holds the risk nonetheless, of sliding incrementally toward inadvertent ‘real war’.
Take, for example, the NATO-orchestrated and equipped incursion into the symbolically significant Kursk Oblast. In terms of a ‘winning narrative’, its appeal to the West is obvious: Ukraine ‘takes the war to into Russia’.
Had the Ukrainian forces succeeded in capturing the Kursk Nuclear Power Station, they then would have had a significant bargaining chip, and might well have syphoned away Russian forces from the steadily collapsing Ukrainian ‘Line’ in Donbas.
And to top it off, (in infowar terms), the western media was prepped and aligned to show President Putin as “frozen” by the surprise incursion, and “wobbling” with anxiety that the Russian public would turn against him in their anger at the humiliation.
Bill Burns, head of CIA, opined that “Russia would offer no concessions on Ukraine, until Putin’s over-confidence was challenged, and Ukraine could show strength”. Other U.S. officials added that the Kursk incursion – in itself – would not bring Russia to the negotiating table; It would be necessary to build on the Kursk operation with other daring operations (to shake Moscow’s sang froid).
Of course, the overall aim was to show Russia as fragile and vulnerable, in line with the narrative that, at any moment Russia, could crack apart and scatter to the wind, in fragments. Leaving the West as winner, of course.
In fact, the Kursk incursion was a huge NATO gamble: It involved mortgaging Ukraine’s military reserves and armour, as chips on the roulette table, as a bet that an ephemeral success in Kursk would upend the strategic balance. The bet was lost, and the chips forfeit.
Plainly put, this Kursk affair exemplifies the West’s problem with ‘winning narratives’: Their inherent flaw is that they are grounded in emotivism and eschew argumentation. Inevitably, they are simplistic. They are simply intended to fuel a ‘whole of society’ common alignment. Which is to say that across MSM; business, federal agencies, NGOs and the security sector, all should adhere to opposing all ‘extremisms’ threatening ‘our democracy’.
This aim, of itself, dictates that the narrative be undemanding and relatively uncontentious: ‘Our Democracy, Our Values and Our Consensus’. The Democratic National Convention, for example, embraces ‘Joy’ (repeated endlessly), ‘moving Forward’ and ‘opposing weirdness’ as key statements. They are banal, however, these memes are given their energy and momentum, not by content so much, as by the deliberate Hollywood setting lending them razzamatazz and glamour.
It is not hard to see how this one-dimensional zeitgeist may have contributed to the U.S. and its allies’ misreading the impact of today’s Kursk ‘daring adventure’ on ordinary Russians.
‘Kursk’ has history. In 1943, Germany invaded Russia in Kursk to divert from its own losses, with Germany ultimately defeated at the Battle of Kursk. The return of German military equipment to the environs of Kursk must have left many gaping; the current battlefield around the town of Sudzha is precisely the spot where, in 1943, the Soviet 38th and 40th armies coiled for a counteroffensive against the German 4th Army.
Over the centuries, Russia has been variously attacked on its vulnerable flank from the West. And more recently by Napoleon and Hitler. Unsurprisingly, Russians are acutely sensitive to this bloody history. Did Bill Burns et al think this through? Did they imagine that NATO invading Russia itself would make Putin feel ‘challenged’, and that with one further shove, he would fold, and agree to a ‘frozen’ outcome in Ukraine – with the latter entering NATO? Maybe they did.
Ultimately the message that western services sent was that the West (NATO) is coming for Russia. This is the meaning of deliberately choosing Kursk. Reading the runes of Bill Burns message says prepare for war with NATO.
Just to be clear, this genre of ‘winning narrative’ surrounding Kursk is neither deceit nor feint. The Minsk Accords were examples of deceit, but they were deceits grounded in rational strategy (i.e. they were historically normal). The Minsk deceits were intended to buy the West time to further Ukraine’s militarisation – before attacking the Donbas. The deceit worked, but only at the price of a rupture of trust between Russia and the West. The Minsk deceits however, also accelerated an end to the 200-year era of the westification of Russia.
Kursk rather, is a different ‘fish’. It is grounded in the notions of western exceptionalism. The West perceives itself as tacking to ‘the right side of History’. ‘Winning narratives’ essentially assert – in secular format – the inevitability of the western eschatological Mission for global redemption and convergence. In this new narrative context, facts-on-the-ground become mere irritants, and not realities that must be taken into account.
This their Achilles’ Heel.
The Kursk ploy no doubt seemed clever and audacious to London and Washington. Yet with what result? It achieved neither objective of taking Kursk Nuclear Power Plant, nor of syphoning Russian troops from the Contact Line. The Ukrainian presence in the Kursk Oblast will be eliminated.
What it did do, however, is put an end to all prospects of an eventual negotiated settlement in Ukraine. Distrust of the U.S. in Russia is now absolute. It has made Moscow more determined to prosecute the special operation to conclusion. German equipment visible in Kursk has raised old ghosts, and consolidated awareness of the hostile western intentions toward Russia.
‘Never again’ is the unspoken riposte.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
August 29, 2024 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.