September 1, 2024
Comrade Kamala Ignites Globalists To Escalate Ukraine Into World War III Before Election
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A forewarning new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov declared Russia won’t exchange territory after the Ukraine Nazi Regime terrorist invasion of the Kursk Region, and he most factually observed: “It is very hard to tell what goal and intent they were pursuing…It’s so simple-minded and naive”, says this observation followed Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev explaining why Kiev and its socialist Western colonial puppet masters want the Donbass Region: “The criminal clique of Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, which has stolen so heavily, has led the country’s economy to disaster, while Kiev’s backers in the US and the EU have also spent a lot on aiding Ukraine during the conflict, which irritates their populations…The West needs a payback from Ukraine,,,It has nothing to do with Zelensky personally…This kid will be gone soon, but the debt will remain…And it must be paid off, with interest…The natural resources located in Donbass are estimated to be worth $7.3 trillion…The area is rich in coal, metals, rare-earth elements and other valuable materials, including lithium…To get access to the coveted minerals, the Western parasites shamelessly demand that their wards in Kiev wage war to the last Ukrainian”.
Earlier today, this report notes, Defense Minister Andrei Belousov proclaimed to the 25th Guards Sevastopol Red Banner Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade fighting on the front lines of the conflict: “Today you are confidently moving forward in one of the most difficult areas – Kupyansk…As a result of your professional and decisive actions, the enemy suffered significant losses and retreated…Showing an example of fortitude and courage in battles with the enemy, you liberated the settlement of Sinkovka in the Kharkov region”—and was a proclamation joined by the Ministry of Defense (MoD) announcing: “Russian forces have eliminated up to 400 Ukrainian troops and 18 armored vehicles in the Kursk Region over the past 24 hours, bringing the total number of Ukrainian soldiers eliminated in the region since 6 August to over 8,200”.
Following the Wall Street Journal reporting: “The administration of President Joe Biden has rejected a Pentagon plan to send American contractors to Ukraine to maintain Western hardware, including F-16 fighter jets” and leftist CNN revealing: “Washington has made it clear that it cannot provide Kiev with any significant number of MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) in the foreseeable future” yesterday, this report continues, the Ministry of Defense announced earlier today: “During an attempt by the Kiev regime to carry out a terrorist attack using unmanned aerial vehicles, Russian air defenses eliminated 46 drones above Kursk Region, 34 above Bryansk Region, 28 above Voronezh Region, and 14 above Belgorod Region…Moscow was also the target of an attack, with seven drones shot down over Moscow Region and two more above the capital itself”.
While the Ukraine Nazi Regime was launching its latest terrorist attack against innocent Russian civilians earlier today, this report details, the leftist New York Times released its article “Ukraine’s Gamble In Russia Has Yet To Slow Moscow’s Eastern Assault”, wherein it worryingly assessed: “More than three weeks into the plan by Ukraine’s military chief to turn the tide of the war by sending troops into Russia, much looks as if it’s proceeding as intended — except that Russians are still advancing inside Ukraine…If the bold plan by Kyiv’s Gen. Oleksandr Syrsky fails, Ukraine could lose many well-trained soldiers and much of the foreign equipment it has deployed to Kursk, as well as land in its own east, where Russian troops — who far outnumber Ukraine’s — persist in their grinding assault on the key transit hub of Pokrovsk…Analysts say it is not at all clear what the end game is — or if Syrsky’s gamble will pay off”—then the Wall Street Journal released its article “Nuclear Weapons Always Stopped Invasions. Then Ukrainian Troops Poured Into Russia”, wherein it warningly observed: “Ukraine’s incursion into Kursk isn’t just a brash bid to upend Russia’s invasion…It also marks the first time that a declared nuclear power has faced invasion and occupation by another country…For decades, nuclear-escalation theory has presumed that countries with atomic weapons were largely immune from attack because an aggressor risked triggering armageddon…Now Western leaders, military thinkers and nuclear theorists are puzzling over what current events mean for prospects of Russian escalation—and for future war gaming…Theoretical risk faces a real-world test, forcing a re-examination of the role nuclear weapons can play in deterrence”.
Most critical to notice about the just released Wall Street Journal article, this report notes, was it citing world-renowned geopolitical conflict expert Professor Janice Stein at the University of Toronto fearfully assessing: “Uncertainty over where Russia’s red lines lie is the fundamental challenge of strategic ambiguity”—world-renowned arms-control negotiator Nikolai Sokov at the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation most gravely warned: “No one really knows the Russian red line—they’ve never given any precision…We may find out later that we crossed the red line two months ago”—and world-renowned Pentagon think tank Rand Corporation nuclear war expert Christopher Chivvis declared in terror about the fast looming apocalyptic nuclear war: “It is like we’re walking in the dark toward a cliff…It is out there somewhere…We just don’t know where it is”.
Last week, this report concludes, President Donald Trump warningly branded Marxist radical Vice President Kamala Harris as “Comrade Kamala”, then it was reported: “Western ground force military commanders of 35 European nations, as well as Ukraine and the United States, held a closed-door secret meeting from Tuesday through Thursday in Dresden-Germany”—top Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declared today about Russian relations with the socialist Biden-Harris Regime: “They have reached the breaking point”—all of which was joined by the American geopolitical article “Globalists Are Trying To Escalate The Ukraine War Into WWIII Before The US Election”, wherein it beyond chillingly assessed:
World War III is a win-win-win for the Davos crowd, as long as it doesn’t go full-on nuclear holocaust and wipe out their carefully crafted surveillance states.
But how do they turn the proxy war into a world war without looking like the bad guys? That’s the trick, isn’t it?
The proxy (in this case, Ukraine) would have to take actions that provoke Russia into an explosive outburst. Russia would have to utilize tactics or weaponry that puts a vast number of civilians at risk, requiring greater NATO involvement and perhaps even UN intervention. They need Russia to level a major city containing hundreds of thousands of civilians. They need Russia to drop a Mother Of All Bombs or nukes. They need a dramatic war crime; otherwise, the western public is not going to support boots on the ground or agree to a military draft.
Popular support for monetary and military aid in Ukraine is waning quickly and Ukraine knows they are about to lose. The Kursk offensive looks like an act of desperation triggered by this reality.
The Kursk region has almost no modern strategic value. It’s a rural agricultural area with a limited industrial base. It does have natural gas pipelines that send energy to Europe, but that doesn’t help Ukraine. They’re already in trouble with Germany for blowing up the Nordstream pipeline. There is also a nuclear power plant in the area but it’s too far away for Ukraine’s troops to seize it (They could try to destroy it with drones and cause a nuclear incident, but this would have to be done covertly without Ukraine taking direct credit).
Mainstream strategists argue that the Kursk operation was designed to force Russia to move crack troops away from the Donbas front where they are making impressive gains. This would allegedly slow down Russia’s attrition based offensive and change the direction of the war. But if that was the plan, it failed miserably.
Ukraine’s troops in Kursk have reportedly been contained. Using NATO-style maneuver tactics to invade Kursk has also done nothing to slow Russia’s advance as they are now primed to take the key city of Toretsk. They are also approaching Pokrovsk (the main staging ground for Ukraine’s forces in the east). These areas are heavily defended with long term entrenchments, but Russia is rolling right through them. The lines beyond these cities are thin or non-existent. Ukraine would immediately be forced to negotiate a cease fire.
Russia also launched the largest missile and drone strikes of the war in fifteen Ukrainian oblasts, causing even greater disruptions to utilities. This proves two things: The Russian military has NOT been diminished or crippled and they still have ample long range ordnance, despite what NATO officials originally claimed.
There’s a reason why Kursk was so lightly defended by Russia – It’s not worth anything to Ukraine in terms of winning the war.
The moment Ukraine crossed onto Russian soil the media and political narrative changed. The word today is that the Kremlin’s “red lines” are meaningless and that Ukraine has proven that Putin is “all talk” when it comes to nuclear weapons and metropolitan strikes. The discussion has turned to the use of US and European long range missiles deep into Russian territory. The Ukrainian government (with NATO behind it) is demanding that US and European officials allow them access to the big-boy toys.
Again, the Biden Administration has to at least appear resistant to this idea. They know if they openly give the green light to offensive ATACM strikes on Russian soil beyond the front that they will be seen as stepping over the line of logistical “support” into the realm of direct warfare with the Russians.
Long range strikes into Russia will set in motion more Russian strikes on major cities in the west of Ukraine where the majority of the population lives. These areas have gone largely untouched during the duration of the war. Putin, despite what the media claims, has been careful to limit the targeting of larger civilian centers. That will end if NATO missiles hit Russian cities.
The idea that ballistic volleys into Russia using NATO supplied missiles won’t result in Putin using MOABs or nukes is truly insane. Keep in mind, long range strikes into Russia will do nothing to change the conditions on the ground in the Donbas.
Eventually these kinds of strikes will lead to a Russian response that will appear brutal; and western warhawks will squeeze that event for all it’s worth. They’ll run with it straight to the Pentagon and demand a plan for US military conscription. If this is the agenda then they’ll need to make it happen BEFORE the elections in November.
Donald Trump is looking increasingly likely to be the winner of the presidential race. I have long held that the globalists will wrap up an economic collapse or a world war and throw it in Trump’s lap. They already tried to do the same thing with the covid pandemic and the inflationary crisis.
The timing of the Kursk offensive and the call for missile strikes on Russia is not a coincidence. Trump claims that his intention is to end the Ukraine war as quickly as possible once he enters office. This will likely mean a leveraged peace settlement that will involve Ukraine giving up the Donbas region to Russia. If Trump is sincere, then there are many elites in the Atlantic Council, the WEF and NATO that will not be happy.
They need to escalate the war into something bigger, something that can’t be undone.
Right now, the war can be ended – All it takes is some diplomacy and forcing Ukraine to understand that they’re not going to get the Donbas or Crimea back no matter how many lives they sacrifice.
But if there are massive civilian casualties on either side, the situation becomes irreversible. I suspect this is what the globalists want.
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
September 1, 2024 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.