July 3, 2025
Propagandists Shield Americans From CIA Bombshell Dropped On Fake News Media
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
An informative new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting American Ambassador Matthew Whitaker to NATO confirmed the United States is suspending its supply of weapons to Ukraine, with him proclaiming: “This is what America first looks like”, says NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte quickly declared: “I totally understand that the US always has to make sure that their own interests are covered, but in the short term, Ukraine cannot do without all the support it can get when it comes to ammunition and to air defense systems”, and top Ukrainian lawmaker Mariana Bezuglaya raged: “The United States is no longer our ally…Trump can go fuck himself”.
At the same time Ukraine was raging against President Donald Trump yesterday, this report notes, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) declassified its bombshell report “Tradecraft Review Of The 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment On Russian Election Interference”—CIA Director John Radcliffe then announced to the American peoples: “All the world can now see the truth: Brennan, Clapper and Comey manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump…Thank you to the career CIA officers who conducted this review and exposed the facts”, and he posted a link to the New York Post article “Obama’s Trump-Russia Collusion Report Was Corrupt From Start: CIA Review”.
In response to the CIA bombshell report horrifyingly documenting how the Obama-Biden Regime made up the Russia collusion hoax to keep President Trump from winning reelection in 2020, this report continues, leftist propagandists at Politico released their lying fake news article “CIA Review Of 2016 Russia Election Probe Finds No Major Flaws” to shield Americans from the truth—and is very effective leftist fake news propaganda as evidenced by Reuters revealing in 2019: “Nearly half of all Americans still believe President Donald Trump worked with Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted after Special Counsel Robert Mueller cleared Trump of that allegation”.
In a mockery to everything truthful journalism stands for, this report concludes, lying leftist fake news propagandists at the New York Times and Washington Post were beyond shamefully awarded the Pulitzer Prize for spreading Trump-Russia collusion hoax lies, as documented in the 2021 article “Will New York Times, Washington Post Return Pulitzer For Misleading Russia Collusion Stories?”, wherein it observed:
In 2018, journalists from The New York Times and The Washington Post won a Pulitzer Prize in national reporting for their biased and inaccurate coverage of Russia’s alleged collaboration with the Trump campaign to interfere with the 2016 election, a claim we now know was a hoax.
So when are they going to return the prize?
If this sounds familiar, it should. This is not the first time the prize—which is supposed to recognize outstanding achievement and public service in journalism—was awarded for misleading and discredited coverage.
In 1931, The New York Times published 13 articles by its Moscow reporter and Communist sympathizer, Walter Duranty, praising the Soviet Union and dictator Joseph Stalin’s government. These articles relied solely on official Soviet communist sources, ignored the evidence contradicting the government’s propaganda, and covered up the genocide Stalin was committing.
In a series of 10 articles, Times reporters propagated a narrative detailing fictitious connections between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, the president’s transition team, and the administration.
The Mueller investigation as well as the Senate Intelligence Committee affirmed that there is no evidence that President Trump or his staff conspired with the Russian government to impact the 2016 election.
Despite these findings, and the inaccuracies in the Times’ articles, the Pulitzer Prize board has not repealed the award.
The Times first publicly acknowledged Duranty’s misinformation in the 1980s, but did not issue a formal apology until 2003, 71 years after Duranty received his prize in 1932.
Will it be 2089 before the New York Times (and the Washington Post) acknowledge their misleading reporting and apologize?
[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
July 3, 2025 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.