I just want to ask about this comment:
“If these ambitions are realized, those portfolios will be carbon neutral by 2050….”
I just want to ask if that is code for…”carbon neutral”…all people, who contain carbon, have been killed…and so the billionaire trillionaire oligarchs that are left pick up the pieces of real property for pennies on the dollar, if they even have to buy them at all? Is that the real meaning of “ambitions”?
And while on that soapbox, has everyone forgotten second grade science? Trees breathe carbon dioxide and create oxygen. It is a symbiotic relationship. You need trees. You need green plants. Or you die. And that goes for the elites too in case they are thinking of getting rid of all nature, which they profess to love.
It is good to try to pick out double speech, but it goes on a lot. After a while, you begin to understand the code because what they say is opposite reality and benefits them and not the nations they are supposed to be serving.
For example, “we want to save our democracy” usually translates “we want to save our oligarchial club”.
“We only have 12 years left due to climate change” means that “if we don’t get this done, change the climate of society in our favor, in the next 12 years, then there will will be a wide enough and strong enough awakening that we won’t be able to do it at all” which is why we have to get it done in “12 years” because “the climate of awareness will hinder our climate change of changing society” from a “climate of freedom (which was getting even greater under Trump which is why they hated him, he put a wrench in their plans)” to one of “transforming the earth into a one-world-medical-dictatorship”.
“We want to get rid of terrorists” is now “we want to get rid of law-and-order Constitution loving patriots who treaten our coup d’etat”.
If you listen closely, you will probably begin to hear the double speak.
Maybe that is one meaning of the phrase, “he that has ears to hear, let him hear”.