Repost by Permission: Biden Loses Second War Against Goat Herders As American Forces Flee

June 23, 2024

Biden Loses Second War Against Goat Herders As American Forces Flee

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A thought-provoking new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today first noting President Putin assessed about the socialist Western colonial proxy war being waged against Russia during his state visit to Vietnam last week: “Apparently, they count on us to chicken out at some point…But at the same time, they say they want to achieve a strategic defeat against Russia on the battlefield…The question then is: why would we be afraid?…Would it not be better to go all the way?”, says this assessment was joined by the news: “Europe’s gas imports from Russia overtook supplies from the United States in May for the first time in almost two years”.

While President Putin was on his state visit to Vietnam, this report notes, socialist Biden Regime official State Department spokesman Matthew Miller absurdly proclaimed that the Vietnam War was “ancient history”—an absurd declaration about a war that saw the Americans decisively defeated by Vietnamese rice farmers 50 years ago, not in the ancient past—the Americans were then decisively defeated by goat herders in Iraq and Afghanistan, the latter of which was quickly followed by the article “Biden Is Betting Americans Will Forget About Afghanistan”, wherein it revealed: “People in and around the White House are relying on Americans’ notoriously short-term memory”—but whose memory of Supreme Socialist Leader Joe Biden losing a war to the goat herders in Afghanistan has not been forgotten by President Donald Trump, who at a massive rally last evening said he was “deeply honored” to be joined at the rally by eight family members of service members killed in Biden’s “catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan”.

After losing a war to the goat herders in Afghanistan, this report continues, late last year it saw Socialist Leader Biden starting a war against the Houthi peoples in Yemen, where goat herding is traditionally done by femalesa war Biden started against the goat herding Houthi peoples because they were attacking socialist Western colonial ships in the Red Sea to support the under siege Palestinian peoples in Gaza—the goat herding Houthi peoples remained undeterred while facing unrelenting American bombing attacksnear immediately after the goat herding Houthi peoples attacked and sunk another Western ship last week, the American article “We Spent A Billion Dollars Fighting The Houthis…And Lost” appeared—and was an article joined today with the news: “The US Navy carrier strike group that’s been battling the Houthis in the Red Sea is finally heading home after spending months in the region protecting shipping lanes from relentless attacks by the Iran-backed rebels…The Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group left the Middle East on Saturday and will remain briefly in the US European Command area of responsibility before returning stateside…It will not see its deployment extended for a third time”.

While Socialist Leader Biden has now lost two wars against goat herders, this report concludes, it’s worthy of notice that neither President Trump or the late President Ronald Reagan lost wars to either goat herders or rice farmers—and is a fact worth noticing because both of these American leaders received sound expert advice based on the history of other nations before starting wars, as best exampled this past week by former top Reagan administration official David Stockman releasing his open letter “The Ukrainian Border War Folly”, wherein he factually documents:

Someone should tell the European ruling elites to take a long jump off a short pier.

Their endless whining about the Ruuskies and Putin is just plain pathetic because—

It’s not justified—Russia bears no hallmarks of an expansionist imperial power.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict is none of western Europe’s business—since its essentially a territorial and civil war within the borders of historic Russia.

If EU officialdom is really concerned about the purported Russian threat why do they spend just a pittance of their GDP on defense?.

Yet, here we have Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, former German defense minister and full-throated war-hawk, talking absolute nonsense:

“Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to see empires and autocracies back in Europe, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told the European Economic Congress in Katowice.

Speaking alongside Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, von der Leyen insisted that she stands for a European Union that is ready to do whatever it takes to protect Europe, and especially Ukraine.

“Putin’s war is about redrawing the map of Europe, but it is also a war on our Union and on the entire global rules-based system,” she said”.

Well, that’s rubbish if there ever was such.  The only time the borders of Ukraine have been redrawn at the barrel of a gun is when Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev did it between 1922 and 1954.  That’s right, this bureaucratic half-wit wants to embroil the world in World War III in order to enforce borders drawn by a trio of history’s most blood-thirsty tyrants.

There never was a country even remotely resembling modern Ukraine until the Soviet communists decreed its existence.  Before that, the pieces and parts of the country’s history go back to the 1650s when one of the more powerful and brutal rulers of the Cossack Hetmanate that occupied a small part of today’s central Ukraine abandoned his tribe’s historic fealty to the Polish kings and switched his loyalty to the Russians.  After that, the “borderlands” ( i.e.”Ukraine” in Russian) were all about vassalage in the Russian Empire and the Soviet one which followed.

During that 375 year span the borders shifted all over the lot and back, as the Mongol, Turkish and Polish-Lithuanian empires receded and the Russian and communist ones expanded.  So what’s so sacrosanct about the very last version of the map—one that hosted both the murderous regime of Stalin and Hitler’s Wehrmacht, too?

Indeed, Europe is rife with borders redrawn again and again.  While von der Leyen was in Poland preaching for border wars in Ukraine, in fact, it might well be asked, which sacrosanct Polish borders did she have in mind?

For 700 years “Poland” has cavorted around the rivers, plains and forests of central Europe like a traveling minstrel show.  This includes its disappearance entirely at the hands of the Prussians, Russians, Hapsburgs and other long-gone lesser powers during the later years of the 18th century and the entirety of the 19th century.  Only in 1919 was it resurrected—in part upon German lands at Versailles because Woodrow Wilson realized that there were votes to be had among the fair part of the Polish nation which had migrated to Chicago and the industrial Midwest.

Then Hitler and Stalin redrew Poland’s borders again under the infamous Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of 1938, cancelling Wilson handwork and returning the German Danzig Corridor to its previous owner.  And then, seven years later, a different set of victors re-carved it again at Yalta, setting borders for “Poland” that satisfied Stalin’s aim to recover eastern lands the Soviets lost in the post-1918 civil war.

Moreover, even a glance at today’s map reminds that the border-drawing work of victorious generals and politicians, and occasionally statesman, has always been subject to revision without necessarily making a war about it. In recent times that’s been true even for the handiwork of the better kind of draftsmen who drew maps at Versailles as opposed to the bloody chambers of the Soviet Empire.

Thus, the statesman at Versailles decreed the existence of Czechoslovakia in 1919 as a potpourri of nations including a lot of Slovaks, Czechs, Hungarians, Romani people, Silesians, Ruthenians, Ukrainians, Poles, Jews and most especially millions of Germans.  So it was subsequently dismembered by Hitler to bring the Sudetenland Germans home; then re-assembled by the Yalta winners; and finally divided between Slovakia and the Czech Republic on peaceable terms in 1993.

Needless to say, you don’t invade the Baltics or Poland—to say nothing of Germany, France, the Benelux and crossing the English Channel—on 3.5% of GDP.  Since full scale war broke out in 2022 Russian military spending has increased significantly to 6% of GDP, but even at current levels it has not been able to subdue even its own historic borderlands.

So if Russia does not have the economic and military capacity to conquer its non-Ukrainian neighbors, let alone Europe proper, what is the war really about?

In short, it is rooted in territorial disputes and civil strife in lands which have been vassals or integral parts of greater Russia for several centuries.  Ukraine actually means “borderlands” in the Russian language.  As we indicated, it now comprises a state that did not even exist until Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev confected it by force of arms after 1920.

In fact, prior to the communist takeover of Russia, no country that even faintly resembled today’s Ukrainian borders had ever existed.  So what NATO’s proxy war actually amounts to is a hideous attempt to enforce the dead hand of the Soviet presidium.

In a word, there has been no unprovoked “invasion” by Moscow of the transitory artifact known as the Ukrainian state.  The latter effectively began and ended with the Soviet Union.

Moreover, with respect to the actual underlying reason for intervention in Ukraine—NATO’s proxy war against Russia– a simple question recurs: Besides restocking the NATO arsenals depleted by the demolition derby in what remains of Ukraine, what’s the reason for NATO’s war?

Alas, the question answers itself.  The War Capital of the World on the Potomac insists upon it, and its vassals in Europe like Ursula von der Leyen nod, jawohl!

[Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

June 23, 2024 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

Romans 10:9 that if you will confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart, one believes resulting in righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made resulting in salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes in him will not be disappointed.” 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, and is rich to all who call on him. 13 For, “Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved.”