Read the article at Gateway Pundit by clicking here.
Based on the article, it sounds like someone(s) figured out a solution just in time to make a lot of money. How timely.
In addition, since the above-referenced article refers to “climate change”, let’s take a stab at translating globalist double speak.
Is the “climate change” they really are referring to the “climate change” of people waking up to the globalist agenda and resisting and overthrowing it?
Is the doomsday “12 years” or whatever their globalist clock now says about how long they have to save the earth, actually a race against a date a supercomputer has generated for them as to how long they have left to implement their globalist agenda before the peoples of the earth wake up and overthrow them?
This is why awakening and resisting is important. There is a race against time and they are like trapped animals that know their ultimate doom is certain and they are trying to escape.
Their time is limited. So they are working overtime to implement their agenda, which is why they are pulling out all the stops.
Do you think this is a correct translation of globalist double-speak? You decide.
Along with this, when they say things like “save democracy” or “save our nation”, do you think they are referring to themselves? And you thought they were talking about you or that they cared about you. They don’t.
They use code words which mean one thing to them but hold the opposite meaning to you. The meaning to them is 180 degrees opposite the meaning to you.
If they are saying that Americans have plenty of money to spend, well, those who have access to the trillions that have been printed in the expansion of the money of supply do have plenty of money to spend. But that didn’t really refer to you as an average American.
It depends on how you define “Americans’. It depends on how you define “nation”. It depends on how you define “illegal”. They have changed the meanings of words and so you can’t have a factual conversation because their vocabulary is different than yours.
If they say the “2020 election was the freest and fairest”, well, in terms of them being able to “freely” corrupt the voting process and “fair” in terms of them getting the edge necessary to overthrow the will of the people, then they might consider that “free” and “fair” since it helped them. Certainly it wasn’t “fair” to pit “basement” Biden against Trump, without a lot of extra help for Biden. There has to be “equal opportunity” you know.
It’s all how you define “free” and “fair”.
They care about absolute money and power.
“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” Source