by Cheryl Jones
Here is one article title; there are probably many other other examples out there.
I understand why the title is written that way, as listed above, and similarly elsewhere.
We all know that because of the internet police, because of censorship, that everyone is very careful about their words:
- possible connection
All of us who are paying attention can do basic math.
And if we are not expert enough, there are plenty of experts, many with multiple degrees or decades of proven experience: statisticians, cyber security experts, physicists, and other legal experts who can give full forensic explanations, audits and evaluations of what happened.
Let’s be honest.
The truth is of no interest to the RINOs, the never-Trumpers, of course not to the Democrats, to the criminals behind the scenes in the shadows, to China, or to the globalists.
So we tiptoe around with the word “suggests”.
The 2020 election was stolen.
The 2022 election was stolen.
And while the “deplorables” recognize that and are speaking out on on social media and other venues, we are not seeing forensic experts on mainstream media.
The election was stolen.
And if there is enough evidence to “suggest” it, which there definitely is, then there should be a process to investigate it.
Ideally, redo the election with security paper, paper ballots.
Take it to court if necessary.
If people are afraid, from news organizations unwilling to lose advertisers and money, to politicians who want to appeal to the politically correct crowd they want votes from, if we are afraid to deal with the truth, then those who market lies will take over the nation, and really, they already have.
Wasn’t that the big thing about Trump? Ohhhhh, (feigned hand on head), he’s so abrasive, so offensive, such meanie tweets.
So you didn’t vote for him, or you didn’t want to back a 2020 audit, or paper ballots.
And now the nation is destroyed.
Unfortunately, the experts we get on TV and radio will never really tell the truth. They may allude to it. But because of the “word-police-who-cancel-people” problem, they pretty well stay in the realm of “suggests” without outright presenting a clear answer.
Jesus said, recorded in Matthew 5:37 (YLT) but let your word be, Yes, Yes, No, No, and that which is more than these is of the evil.
So there is a lot of evil hiding behind the word, “suggests”.
If there can’t be a definitive yes, or no, if there are numbers that “suggest fraud”, then have the courage and wisdom and honesty to actually dig into what happened. And if people don’t want the investigation, why not? What are they hiding?
If there is enough evidence to “suggest fraud”, then there is enough evidence to have a national online forensic audit with experts, not just with those who will say the politically correct thing.