Repost by Permission: Trump Shockingly Warns Putin: “Either God Will Win, Or I Will Die”

December 6, 2017

Trump Shockingly Warns Putin: “Either God Will Win, Or I Will Die

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A stunning Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) report circulating in the Kremlin today detailing the agenda of Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson for their meetings tomorrow in Vienna, during the summit of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), states that the “priority item” heading the list for discussion is President Donald Trump’sdeclaration of war” decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel—and reveals that Trump had previously related to President Putin that he had no choice to do as he needed “divine protection” to protect himself and his nation from “satanic forces”—and who bluntly warned: “Either God will win, or I will die”. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]


President Donald Trump seeks “divine protection” as he tries to save America from Satan


According to this report, on 21 November, President Putin and President Trump had a lengthy discussion wherein America’s new leader “praised/congratulatedPutin for saving Russia by turning it back to God—and that was solidified by Putin, a few days later, by his calling for a return to “traditional values” and becoming the first Russian leader to call for tighter relations between the Kremlin and the Orthodox Church in a move hailed by His Holiness Patriarch Kirill as an “historic event”.


President Vladimir Putin and His Holiness Patriarch Kirill seek “divine protection” to save Russia from Satan


President Trump, also, this report continues, informed President Putin that he was going to recognize Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel—with his explaining that he was doing so because of an Old Testament (Torah) Biblical verse that says “and I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed”—which Trump said he needed the “divine protection” of as his “Deep State” satanic aligned enemies were seeking to destroy him, and his grimly telling Putin: “Either God will win, or I will die”.

President Trump’s fears that he faces death for his turning America back to God, this report says, are not being exaggerated—and as best exampled, just days, ago by the “Deep State” aligned mainstream propaganda news network MSNBC openly fantasizing about Trump being hanged with a noose around his neck, and his entire family, also, being sent to prison for the rest of their lives.


The “Deep State” hoped for ending of President Donald Trump


To President Trump’s fears that America and the West are being overcome by satanic powers, this report says, is, also, shockingly true—and as just evidenced this past week alone by the “Deep State” aligned propaganda mainstream media slamming Trump for his daring to say the words “Merry Christmas” and praising the birth of Jesus Christ, a leading Church of England clergyman calling for prayers so young Prince George will become homosexual and “find love of young gentlemen, Hollywood just declaring as its Best Picture for 2017 a movie celebrating the homosexuality of minor children, and Hillary Clinton now being celebrated as being an angel.



With the billionaire tech giants in America now being revealed to be performing satanic sexual rituals “to get in touch with their souls, this report continues, the most disturbing evidence showing how much the US has come under the sway of Satan was demonstrated this past week—and was when former President Barack Obama, as one of the “Deep State” leaders seeking to destroy President Trump, flew to Paris to meet with the Les Napoleons organization—which is a peculiarly-named Frenchcommunications network” comprised of globalist elites seeking the destruction of America and all Western Christian values.


Theistic Satanism logo of Les Napoleons proclaims its true purpose


With former American UN Ambassador John Bolton now shockingly proclaiming that President Trump is being confronted with “the first attempted coup d’état in US history”, this report details, the “Deep State” war to destroy Trump has descended into a travesty of justice with it now being said that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is nothing more than a semblance of law-enforcement disguising the brute reality that Trump is being punished for winning the election and defying Obama policy—and that, stunningly, even the rabidly anti-Trump propaganda newspaper The Washington Post agrees with, and who have just proclaimed: “A new Special Counsel needs to investigate the FBI and Justice Department. Now!”.

As to what drove even the leftist Washington Post to side with President Trump against the “Deep State”, this report explains, was Special Counsel Mueller, this past week, charging former National Security Director General Michael Flynn with a crime for lying to the FBI (called the “perjury trap of the century”)—specifically to the now disgraced former FBI Counterintelligence Chief Peter Strzok.

The grave crime committed by Special Counsel Mueller in his filing charges against General Flynn, this report explains, was his failing to inform Flynn that his accuser, Strzok, had been removed from the case for violating both US law and FBI procedures—which is a gross “Giglio Violation” that could very well result in the disbarment of Mueller—and had been established as US Constitutional law, in 1972, by the US Supreme Court—who in their Giglio v. United States decision declared that actions such as Mueller’s, in his not informing Flynn about what Strzok had done, meant that no charges against an accused could stand.



With absolutely no proof that President Trump ever colluded with Russia, but with enough proof to fill volumes that Trump’s officials colluded with Saudi Arabia and colluded with Israel, this report continues, the “Deep State” having chosen Russia to attack Trump with is destroying America’s reputation the world over as by the day it more resembles a banana republic than a free democracy, especially due to Trump’s retaliation against all of these Western globalists opposing him—and that has led Germany to just declare:

The global dominance of the United States is slowly becoming history…the withdrawal of the United States under Donald Trump from its reliable role as a guarantor of western-led multilateralism accelerates a change of the world order with immediate consequences for German and European interests.

Germany can no longer simply react to US policy but must establish its own position… even after Trump leaves the White House, relations with the US will never be the same.



This report concludes by noting that even though President Trump is still engaged in a deadly war against his nations “Deep State” to free America from the satanic forces seeking its destruction, his cooperation with Russia to free the Christian peoples of Syria shows his truest character—and whom, in less than a year since his taking power, has just enabled Armed Forces Chief of Staff General Valery Gerasimov to declare: “All terrorist units of ISIS on Syrian soil have been destroyed, and the territory is liberated.”—and whom President Putin, also, intends to keep fully supporting—and is why, just hours ago, he announced his plan to run for office again—with the hope being that both he and Trump can, indeed, “Make The World Great Again”.



December 6, 2017 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

Continue Reading

The Unasked Questions

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.  John Adams

The problem with five and ten second newscast questioning is that it is wholly inadequate to consider problems within the context of the larger historical or economic or legal issue at hand.  The same lack of foresight exists with a news article that is edited to so many words to get its point across.

There have been a lot of questions asked on whether the Kentucky clerk should have given the license or not.  To answer that question you need to go back to this quote.

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.  John Adams

When you study the framework of when the Constitution was written, and understand the thinking of the Founding Fathers, they were Christians (many) or deists (not too many).  In either case, they believed in a supreme Creator…Nature’s God…or the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.  The Declaration of Independence states this.

In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.


We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it….

Nature’s God has to do with nature.  How that pertains to marriage is one man and one woman, or one male and one female.  That is nature as created by nature’s God.  This kind of question of giving a license to two men would never exist.  It is contrary to the law of nature and Nature’s God.    Again…the question is of a moral and religious people.  A Christian religious people understand God created Adam and Eve, God created marriage, and Jesus’s first miracle was at a wedding of a man and a woman.  That is where he chose to begin his miraculous ministry, endorsing marriage.

And again, “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” would be within a Christian framework, that of obeying the laws of God.  The Bible states repeatedly that freedom is the freedom to walk in the ways God has laid out for mankind, not freedom to do anything, not freedom to break the Ten Commandments, not freedom to walk contrary to God’s laws.  It is freedom to fulfill God’s commandments and mandates to mankind.  Again, all these words such as “life”, “liberty”, and “freedom” need to be understood within the Christian context in which they were first framed in our Christian historical context, and within the Bible, the Word of God, prior to that.

So to consider the actions of the woman in Kentucky correctly you need to go back to the understanding of the Founding Fathers.  Newt Gingrich, in his 2008 run for Republican Presidential nominee, got this concept correctly when no one else was talking about it.  He pointed out that Thomas Jefferson would simply remove the positions of judges gone rogue.  In other words, in our day, the judges that change historical meanings of words, and ignore historical precedent of centuries, such as marriage being between one man and one woman, even Supreme Court judges, would be gone.  The recent ruling could not have happened.  Judges would have to uphold the original meaning of the Bill of Rights, and the historical meanings of words, and judicial decisions made on historical definitions of words.  Our Supreme Court judges went rogue in this respect.

In the context of those who created the country, religious liberty was important enough to put it in the Bill of Rights.

Let’s switch gears and come at the problem from a different angle, one that is not too unbelievable in the context of what is happening in Europe.  Suppose a country gets overrun with a multitude of people with a philosophy contrary to the historical founding documents and laws of a nation or nations.  Let’s suppose that that new majority, which is given voting privileges by secular liberals, votes itself into the majority.  Suppose, once they are in the majority, they significantly change the laws to be contrary to the founding and historical laws of centuries.  Suppose the law is changed to Sharia law.  Should freedom loving people simply acquiesce?  Should they simply roll over and say, that’s the law now?  Or should they recognize the long-term strategy of what is being done to them and resist?  Which brought forth more good to the world…western civilization based on Christianity…hospitals, universities, charities, the Constitution, property rights, and it used to be, jurisprudence based on the freedoms God gave to mankind, and of course, knowledge of the redemptive work of Christ and missionaries.  Or…Sharia law.  If you don’t know the answer to that question, and don’t know the difference, then you are not the one to be debating the question.  You have study to do.  Lots of it.

Again, and this was in the context of Christianity and Christians, for they were the majority at the time of the establishment of this nation:

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.  John Adams

When the media is not able to think historically, or look down the road to the larger picture, and not ask the correct larger questions, they do everyone a disservice.  The whole question of the problem in Kentucky is part of a larger problem, of the subverting of the Constitution by those who were sworn to protect it.  When anyone in any other job description, other than government, fails to follow the job description, they are removed or fired from the job.  Government seems to be the  one arena where the candidate for the job can promise one thing, and then do another once in office, without being removed and without penalty.  This should not be because the military is sworn to uphold the Constitution as well.  Apparently, the oaths of office mean nothing to everyone.  And when those in government have no concern about their oaths to office, that is true anarchy.

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.  John Adams


Continue Reading