This is a portion of the show below, beginning with a great medley on media propaganda.
Mention is made of Romans 13 in a clip where the government is quoted. Romans 13 is misunderstood by many and deceitfully used by a corrupt government trying to bring Christians in line with its (the corrupt government’s) evil agenda. If you really believe Romans 13 means to back up and follow the government no matter what, then you were for Hitler. After all, he told you to kill the Jews in concentration camps, right?
Here are some prior comments on Romans 13 in a prior post.
What has to happen to beat ISIS is unlikely to happen if the past is any indication of the future.
The whole situation is like a big puzzle and people keep puzzling how to put in the last puzzle piece. There is only one place left on the puzzle and only one piece that will fit that place, and people are loath to do it.
I was listening to someone in the military say that whenever recommendations are given to Obama, he gives 25% of what is requested.
Just put the last puzzle piece in, look at it the way it has to be looked at, and it is very simple. If Obama is a Muslim, if his sympathies are with the Muslims, however you want to say it, if he really doesn’t have the heart to get rid of ISIS, if they are his Muslim Brotherhood buddies, his “homies”, call it what you want, when the military commanders tell him how to defeat ISIS, he now has the intelligence information (we are not talking IQ here, we’re talking intelligence as in military strategy) to know what not to do in order to get rid of ISIS, so just give the military a lot less than it asks.
The only way to counter that would be for the commanders to ask for about eight times what they need and then when Obama cuts down that figure to 25% of the total, there would be a chance at winning.
You say, well they (meaning the Obama administration) all say they want to beat ISIS. Well, the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the high levels of the administration and there is a Muslim term called “taqiyya” which means, it is okay to lie to the enemy. The enemy in this case are those who believe in an America run by the Constitution and don’t believe in Muslim sharia law.
This has to be said really plain because it seems that so many have such a tough time accepting that the puzzle piece fits the way it does…yes, if Obama is for the Muslims, then he is not for America. Yes, it goes back to the birth certificate and even if it didn’t, it’s the “Muslim thing”. Accept it.
So the only way to win against ISIS is for the military to remove Obama as an “enemy domestic” as in the military oath “against all enemies foreign and domestic”. If he is removed, and the military commanders have a plan, they can finish the plan in 90 days as they stated.
It will never happen as long as Obama is there. And Obama will remain there because people don’t want to accept that he is what he is, he is not what he has professed to be, he has done the greatest scam probably in the whole history of the world, with the exception perhaps of the serpent in the garden with Adam and Eve.
If you want to win against ISIS, the military must remove Obama on the basis of their oath. No one wants to, but that’s the way it is. And probably no one will do it. So this will drag out for two years and this is what they hoped for before, that they could vote him out in 2012…how did that work? And do they really believe if ISIS has two more years that there will be an election in 2016?
Either the Founding Fathers were supremely stupid, or there is some option within the Constitution to remove someone who has totally gone against his oath of office and is treasonous. People want to use the ballot box to remove Obama and others like him. What? If they don’t follow the Constitution, if they lie, if they are treasonous, if they aid the enemy that’s okay? They get to keep their positions until an election? Why? Is that how it was set up?
The founding fathers were well aware of the sinfulness of men, the tendency of those in office to garner all power unto themselves like a king. That’s why they put in the Second Amendment. They understood the possibility that unethical leaders would attempt to get into office. That said, .. is there is no way to get rid of a politician gone bad? What about treason? What about someone who really isn’t qualified due to the birth certificate issue to be there…doesn’t that make everything he has signed null and void? What? Nothing? Is there no educated person in law or military law or the Constitution or international law that has any answer? Or are those with the answer to afraid to give it? The fact is, if those who know how to solve this, do not act, their lives and safety are not secured. A dictator will use you, then toss you when you are no longer needed.
If you save your life, you will lose it. Jesus.