I started last night discussing Obama’s Santorum strategy. I want to amplify that.

The birth control issue came up more than once in the debates. As the moderator joked, as people were booing, he stated, “it’s a very popular topic”. Nevertheless, the question was presented anyway.

Like a wedge, the contraceptive question that started during the debates began to edge itself into the minds of the American people until it has reached the point where it is today.

I remember the first debate when it was mentioned and making a live comment during the debate that “this is a waste of time”.   With all the serious issues addressing the nation, why should we be focused on contraceptives? I see it now as a strategy that Obama has effectively used to move the candidate field away from Newt Gingrich, who is the one candidate that Obama is concerned about, towards Rick Santorum, whom  Obama is not that concerned about for reasons discussed in the first post, “Obama’s Santorum Strategy”.

The whole contraceptive discussion, which has turned into a First Amendment issue, has helped push forward Santorum, as family matters are his strong venue. And that is exactly what Obama  and his strategists want.

As I said before, there is one person that Obama DOES NOT want to debate or meet on the political battlefield, and that is Newt Gingrich. This moves things towards Santorum and away from Newt Gingrich.

I would like to point out something else since we’re on the topic of the First Amendment. The press and pundits and voices were against Newt Gingrich when he talked about his Jeffersonian plan to remove activist judges. I, for one, extremely support him in that Jeffersonian idea. Having researched and written the free book (full of quoted material, you can get a copy by clicking here), I know that there are a lot of communists and radicals embedded within the US government and its agencies. These unnamed bureaucrats working behind the scenes are not all Constitutional, Bill of Rights activists. Far from it.

There are radical judges legislating from the bench. If they don’t want to follow the Constitution, they do need to be removed. And that goes for politicians and anyone else in government as well.

You see, Newt Gingrich already had the answer, and all the popular media and voices booed and shouted him down. If a judge wants to legislate against the First Amendment (the issue coming to the forefront due to the contraceptive question), then a President Newt Gingrich would remove him according to principles that Thomas Jefferson operated. How simple. How decisive. How not politically correct. How effective a solution.

You see, when you reject an answer, you get the opposite. There is no neutral ground. People rejected Newt Gingrich and his plan to remove activist judges. Conservative politicians, conservative media, and conservative voices in general fought him. It’s the same general fight that Newt Gingrich experiences on all fronts because most people don’t have his far reaching vision. So how is that First Amendment question that is looming working out for you? Do you still not want to remove the activist judges? Do you want to take a chance and play it safe and politically correct?

Newt Gingrich is smart enough to be out in front of the issues, answering the problems before they even start, or providing simple solutions to complex problems. Great thinkers can always simplify things: E = mc², 2 + 2 = 4. He had an answer for the current First Amendment fiasco before the issue even came up. Small thinkers cannot think far enough down the road. Newt Gingrich does and he gets rejected because other people’s thinking is too small. So they go for the comfortable solution that does not take them too far out of their mental comfort zone, and all is lost.

Vote Newt Gingrich. Go to his site by clicking here. Donate to him. Volunteer for him.

I hope you have fully read “Obama’s Santorum Strategy” as well as this post, “Obama’s Santorum Strategy, Part II” and see that to support and vote for anyone but Newt Gingrich is to ensure an Obama win.

And, if the Republicans can really get courageous, they can work to get Obama out due to the probable fraud talked about by Sheriff Joe Arpaio. I personally think they don’t have the guts, would rather play softball, and risk losing. But perhaps somehow courage will arise within them and they will do the courageous thing. I don’t see it happening any time soon, so the election may go to Obama due to reasons I will cover in my next post. If the Republicans don’t get courageous enough to take Obama out due to criminal charges, then the only hope for a win is Newt Gingrich.

If they do get courageous, and keep Obama off the ballot, then the only question is which candidate is the best. Clearly Newt Gingrich is the best. He has positive solutions. He doesn’t have to force some kind of reluctant following like Romney who has had to spend millions in false, negative advertising to get people to listen to him.

Which would you rather have? A President Gingrich with positive solutions already on his site, $2.50/gallon gas, a “jobs and paycheck” President Newt Gingrich, or someone who focused on negative ads rather than positive solutions in the process of trying to win.

Don’t fall for Obama’s Santorum strategy.  Go over to Newt.org and support Newt Gingrich.  Donate to his campaign and volunteer your time.