There can be a difference in viewpoint as to how the intelligence leaks are viewed.

The overriding opinion seems to be that Obama and his administration allowed this to paint a picture of a ”in charge” leader.  This viewpoint holds that because this is an election year, we are finding out about intelligence behind the scenes and how it has been used and the “kill list” to paint a perception of a “tough” commander-in-chief.  This viewpoint holds that this is all for political gain to garner votes in November.

There is another way of looking at it.  The question arises, if this were not an election year, would the same type of leaks have happened?  If there were no potential perceived political gain from the voting electorate, would these stories have come to light?  If the answer is, “possibly”, “maybe”, or “yes”, then a different conclusion might be drawn…that there is an element diametrically opposed to and contrary to the interests of the United States operating out of the White House.

As radical a conclusion as that may seem, the fact is, Obama went to a Muslim school, comes from a Muslim family, and has had Muslim, as well as radical Saul Alinsky ties.  Muslims are killed for leaving the faith…so did he ever leave it?  He was not adequately vetted by the media  in 2008 for us to know his background, which he sealed by Exectutive Order his first day in office.

So, could we have a trojan horse Muslim radical in the White House, posing as a Christian for political gain?  The Muslims allow the philosophy of “taqiyya” which means you can lie to the enemy, and haven’t we seen a lot of lies from this Administration?

A Muslim would like nothing better than cause trouble for Israel, as has happened through this security leak.

There has to be a lot more thorough and faster evaluation of this than “Fast and Furious”.  The “Fast and Furious” investigation has gone on for 18 months, with little to show for it.  There is no private sector company that would take 18 months to investigate one of its employees. 

To delay dealing with this issue is fatal to the interests of the United States, particularly if the difference in viewpoint, that this was not done for political gain, but for some other sinister reason, is correct.  For then there are enemies of the state in the highest levels of government, and they must be removed before more damage  is done.

As stated, there can be a difference in viewpoint.