“If we can think of these questions, then others can too.”

I believe I can provide an understandable framework to what happened in Benghazi.

I’ve said this before on this blog. A situation like what happened in Benghazi is completely understandable if you consider the fraud of the birth certificate and add that to the narrative.

I will go through this step by step.

If Obama has a fraudulent birth certificate, he is not a legitimate commander-in-chief or President.

If he is not legitimate, and got there by fraud, do you think he has the best interests of the United States in mind?

So what is he?

Muslim…raised a Muslim, told George Stephanopolous, “my Muslim heritage”, curried favor with Islamic nations during his Islamic  nation tour

Radical…follows Saul Alinsky, taught Saul Alinsky principles

Has radical friends…his former radical pastor, also, Bill Ayer’s dad helped pay for Obama’s Harvard education.

Communist…had many communist relatives and mentors

Trojan Horse…sent into office in a stealth way to destroy the nation

Usurper/Coup d’Etat…a coup d’etat exists when part of the existing government illegally takes over. Obama with the fraudulent birth certificate fits the bill

Wants to conquer the United States and put in Sharia law…the building of the mosque near 9-11 is a symbol of victory to Muslims. He had the Muslim Brotherhood to DC. Do you think he would still be alive if he were not Muslim?   When do Muslims leave the Muslim faith without being killed?

A question I have wondered for four years is if Obama swore in on a Bible, and the Bible is the basis of the Judeo/Christian based laws in this country, or a Koran.  You know he had a botched swearing in ceremony, and went through a second one with Chief Justice John Roberts.  But then again, since Chief Justice John Roberts was the deciding vote for Obamacare, do you think we will ever know the real truth?

Let’s put it all together…he is a fraud, imposter president, who got there by fraudulent, and probably criminal means as defined by law using an illegal document. He is a radical, Communist, Muslim sent as a trojan horse for a dark cabal oligarchy and is enacting a coup d’etat.  The purpose is to turn the United States Muslim and enact Sharia law as part of a larger picture of the Muslims wanting to take over the world.

This is an obvious conclusion. Any other understanding of Obama comes up with the many questions of why is he doing what he does?  Things make no sense except when viewed from the lens of who he really is and what he really represents.  Then things become obvious, painfully obvious, and that is what no one wants to look at or believe.

Let me add this as well.  As I have said before, there can be radical “emergencies” that happen that end up becoming cause to call off the election or the inauguration.  The ex-CIA agent makes reference to the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.  What if the event in Benghazi was some kind of test, some kind of signal to the Muslim Brotherhood, sort of like a fraternity initiation, to prove that Obama was really siding with them.  Would they/will they, in return, as the election results come in, as the United Nations is out patrolling the election, create some kind of chaos that requires military (and there are foreign military troops) in the nation?  Will the Muslim Brotherhood, having seen that Obama will not fight them as he did nothing while Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were killed, will they look at that as their sign that they are to “aid” in the election by creating chaos at the polls, outside the polls, and radical principles follow “let no good crisis go to waste”?

Addendum:  I had basically finished this post and then came across this video.  Apparently, I am not the only person thinking along these lines.

The way I state is, and have stated it before, is that Obama is not a commander-in-chief, but an enemy-in-chief. He is a Muslim sent to turn this nation over to Sharia law. This is treasonous.