Recently, a panel in Washington, D.C., ruled against requiring voter IDs in Texas. That was a bad ruling. This is not that difficult.  I am glad the Texas Attorney General will appeal this.

The bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., need to get out in the world and get a real job. They don’t have a lick of common sense and it is hurting the rest of us. But then again, that is part of the plan…to hurt American citizens and destroy the nation from within through a trojan horse coup d’etat (see prior posts under that keyword).

Again, I will take this moment to remind everyone that criticized Newt Gingrich for wanting to get rid of judges…those of you who opposed Newt Gingrich are going to see the logic of ”why” if Communist/Socialist/Sharia law judges are appointed who don’t rule according to the Constitution that you should be getting rid of them, as Thomas Jefferson did.  Newt Gingrich is so smart that he was thinking down the playing field several plays and it is a real shame that so many opposed him on that. Newt Gingrich got it right.

The latest issue is that judges consider that requiring a voter ID to vote places “strict, unforgiving burdens on the poor”. I don’t know that they are that worried about the poor, but about their voting block (the block that votes for welfare doling politicians) being able to vote once, twice, thrice or to vote illegally and be able to remain incognito. You can read more by clicking this link here.  The same “poor”, if they want to ever get out and get a real job in the world, will need two forms of ID. It’s probably been a long time since anyone in Washington, D.C. had to have a real job, but if  they tried to go get a job they would need that ID.   I think it might be more of a “strict, unforgiving burden”, if there were no way to show IDs and get a job and get out of the cycle of poverty, but then again,  liberals have a vested interest in locking their voting blocks into poverty so that they will have people who will perpetually vote for welfare giving politicians.  The real burden on the poor is not being able to break out of the cycle of poverty.

Also, the bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., need to consider that the “poor” need to have some kind of ID when they go get welfare. Just try walking into a welfare office and sit down and ask for some welfare without having an ID.   There is a TV show, or at least there was, where bosses would go undercover to see what was happening on the job in the lower levels of their rank and file employees.  I think bureaucrats ought to go buy some of those jeans with holes in them, put on a ragged T-shirt, and go apply for welfare and see what happens.  They might be surprised that there are strict requirements and one them is a form of ID. 

Then there is the argument that the “poor” can’t get to somewhere where they can get a picture ID. Well, they get to the grocery store. How do they do that? Maybe they can stop by the DMV on the way and pick up a photo ID. I know here in Texas, in some cases, the poor get a little bit of non-food stamp money. I am sure there would be a way to take $10 of that and get a photo ID…and of course, with that photo ID, only American citizens would be able to vote.  That would be a problem to democrat politicians who typically get the welfare vote.  We would find that a lot of the people on welfare are illegal immigrants.

I am sure that the problem with voter ID, “like father, like son”, is more about that if the person in the White House doesn’t need to show the ID, then there has to be a similar culture for everyone.   It has to be a popular idea, that ID is not required, in order to protect Obama from needing to show his valid birth certificate, which he never has done.  Of course, we are not supposed to be living according to a culture of popularity, or by popular opinion, but the country should be run according to the Constitution. That is a problem for the bureaucrats and officials in Washington, D.C., who don’t care for the Constitution all that much, actually, some of them don’t care for it at all.

Let’s get into the reality zone with the voter ID issue. The poor, who have nothing to do all day, could surely figure out how to get a picture ID, if there were some kind of reason to do so.   And if you say, well they are busy trying to get work, trying to get out of poverty, well, then that presumes they have a car to go to job interviews, and could drive themselves to the DMV or some other place where they could get an ID at the same time they are driving around trying to get a job.  And of course, they are going to need that ID for a job.  

This is not that difficult. If the government can set up numerous welfare offices (how do people get there to those welfare offices?  that must be some kind of burden?), I’m sure they could figure out a way to take a picture ID at the same time.  Now that is a thought…take a picture of the people when they go to the welfare office, the problem is solved.  Of course, then that would prove how many non-Americans are getting welfare, and that would not be good for liberal politicians and liberals to be advertising that or getting statistics on that. It might make tax-paying American citizens furious.

Here is more on that statement from the same judge panel, click on the quote to go to the original article.

A three-judge panel in Washington ruled Thursday that the law imposes “strict, unforgiving burdens on the poor” and noted that racial minorities in Texas are more likely to live in poverty.

Well, duh, I guess they will be locked into poverty because they won’t have their two forms of ID to go get a job.  It seems like these judges aren’t very smart or long range thinkers, if they think at all, to realize that having proper ID is the first step of getting a ticket out of poverty. You would think they would want to help the poor, by thinking long range, but then again, this is probably really not about helping the poor, but about keeping a “bought and paid for”-with-welfare-and-food-stamps, voting block.

Let’s all start joining in pointing out the stupidity of the logic of the bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. Just how did they get their jobs anyway? Are most of them appointed? They don’t seem to be too bright. The things they say won’t “go” in the real world. So why does the press give them a pass?

We shouldn’t put stupidity and lack of common sense on the same level as logic. Let’s start calling these stupid decisions what they are…stupid. Let’s not just stay silent and act like we don’t know that something is wrong. Don’t give these people a pass. They are the ones taxing you, your children, and destroying the future of the nation. So call them out. Don’t remain silent and act like what they do should be on an equal footing with logic and the way things work in the real world of capitalism and the free market…unless, of course you prefer Communism and oppression.

Any football game was never won just by playing defense. You have to get out there on the offense. Cut them off at the pass. We know what they are doing. Let’s get out there, all of us, and throw out the crowd that doesn’t want to follow the Constitution, but wants to rule by Saul Alinsky radical principles.  Stand against them.  Vote them out, some have initiated lawsuits against them.  Perhaps run for office if you believe in the Constitution.  Clean them out, these termites who are destroying the fabric of our Constitutional Republic.  They should not have a free pass.  Do you get a free pass in your life and on your job to do the wrong, illogical, irresponsible and stupid thing?

This is not that difficult.